TurkerView
  • Requesters
  • Institutions
  • Scripts
  • Queuebicle
  • API
  • Qualifeye
  • Forum
  • Search
  • Login
  • Login
    • Action
    • Another action
    • Something else here
    • Separated link

Search TurkerView

  • Requesters
  • HITs
  • Scripts

Sorry, have to turn this off for a day to try and fix a query search bug!

Dacia Oberhelman

Is this your requester account?
University of North Dakota
  • Overview
  • Reviews 7
  • HITs

Dacia Oberhelman Ratings


Workers feel this requester pays well

Poor Communication

Approves Quickly

No Rejections

No Blocks
Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.

Dacia Oberhelman Wage History


Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.
Heads up! We'll never hide reviews unless they violate our Terms of Service.

Top Worker Reviews

  • More
    • Best
    • Newest
    • Rejected
    • Hourly (High)
    • Hourly (Low)
    • My Reviews

Ezridax Careful Reader
Reviews: 2,431
Points: 1,610
Ratings: 209
Self-report survey regarding your experience with consent in sexual encounters. - $1.00

Generous

Unacceptable

Approved

$163.64 / hour

00:00:22 / completion time

Pros

I screened out of most of the survey but it gave me a code to "submit for payment."

Cons

Requestor did not respond to messages I sent after doing this.

Advice to Requester

I don't really think you meant to do a $1 screener. Maybe next time you'll want to either do a 10 cent screener and give a qual for the rest of the survey or bonus people .90 for completing the rest of the survey.
Nov 12, 2018

InfiniteChanges Proficient Worker
Reviews: 19,047
Points: 12,335
Ratings: 1,088
Theoretical Fit of the Psychology of Working with First-Generation Students in the WorkForce - $0.10

Unrated

Unrated

Approved

$1.33 / hour

00:04:31 / completion time

Pros

Cons

- Only do this if you DON'T match the screener questions, if not it pays garbage for the full survey (supposedly it's 50 cents which makes this a $6 survey IF it pays out)
Oct 17, 2019

TurkedOut Relaxed Pace
Reviews: 2,748
Points: 1,247
Ratings: 74
Self-report survey regarding your experience with consent in sexual encounters. - $1.00

Unrated

Unrated

Pending

$163.64 / hour

00:00:22 / completion time

Pros

Screened out but still gave me a completion code it told me to enter to get paid. Worth a shot

Cons

Nov 12, 2018

Want to see Dacia Oberhelman's full profile?

Create Your Account

or Login

Dacia Oberhelman


A1K8VHW2FCA050 MTurk Search Contact Requester

Recently Reviewed HITs


Self-report survey regarding your experience with consent in sexual encounters.
Theoretical Fit of the Psychology of Working with First-Generation Students in the WorkForce

Ratings Legend

Wage Aggregates

Reward Sentiment

Communication Scores

Approval Tracking

Wage Aggregate Tracking

This is fairly straightforward: we take the completion time & the reward amount (where available) and calculate the average hourly rate for the task. We then apply that number to a simple range based on US minimum wage standards to color-code the data for easy to digest numerical data.

Color Pay Range (Hourly) Explanation
RED < $7.25 / hr Hourly averages below US Federal minimum wage
ORANGE $7.25 - $10.00 / hr Hourly averages between Federal & highest statewide (CA) minimum wages.
GREEN > $10.00 / hr Hourly averages above all US minimum wage standards

Reward Sentiment

Not all HITs are created equal. Sometimes an hourly wage doesn't convey the full story of a HIT's true worth, so we encourage workers to give their opinion on the overall pay of the task. Was it $8/hr to rate pictures of puppies? A worker could justifiably bump up the rating a bit for something so adorable. 10 hours locked in Inquisit? Even for $10/hr many workers would appreciate the heads up on such a task. The Pay Sentiment rating helps connect workers beyond the hard data.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Underpaid 1 / 5
  • Very low or no pay
  • Frustrating work experience
  • Inadequate instructions
Low 2 / 5
  • Below US min-wage ($7.25/hr)
  • No redeeming qualities to make up for pay
Fair 3 / 5
  • Minimum wages for task (consider SE taxes!)
  • Work experience offers nothing to tip the scales in a positive or negative direction
Good 4 / 5
  • Pay is above minimum wage, or compensates better than average for the level of effort required.
  • The overall work experience makes up for borderline wages
Generous 5 / 5
  • Pay is exceptional.
  • Interesting, engaging work or work environment
  • Concise instructions, well designed HIT.

Communication Ratings

Communication is an underrated aspect of mTurk. Clear, concise directions. A fast response to a clarification question or a resolution to a workflow suggestion can all be valuable aspects of interaction between Requesters & Workers and its worth keeping track of. Plus everyone enjoys the peace of mind knowing that if something does go wrong there will be an actual human getting back to you to solve the issue.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Unacceptable 1 / 5
  • No response at all
  • Rude response without a resolution
Poor 2 / 5
  • Responsive, but unhelpful
  • Required IRB or extra intervention
Acceptable 3 / 5
  • Responded in a reasonable timeframe
  • Resolves issues to a minimum level of satisfaction.
Good 4 / 5
  • Prompt Response
  • Positive resolution
Excellent 5 / 5
  • Prompt response time
  • Friendly & Professional
  • Helpful / Solved Issues
  • Interacts within the community

Approval Time Tracking

This rating is strictly for approval times. Let's face it, no one wants to mix approval time ratings with how fast a Requester rejects a HIT, so we've saved rejection flags for another category. This provides a more straightforward way to know about how long your HIT might sit pending before paying out. The default auto-approval for most MTurk tasks is 3 days, the maximum is 30 days. We've tried to base our ratings around those data-points.

Icon Rating Approval Time
Very Slow 1 / 5 Over 2 weeks
Slow 2 / 5 ~1 - 2 Weeks
Average 3 / 5 ~3 - 7 Days
Fast 4 / 5 ~1 - 3 Days
Very Fast 5 / 5 ~24 hours or less

Login

Login Failed! Please check your username/password and try again.
TurkerHub Member? Just use your normal TurkerHub credentials to log in to TurkerView.
Don't have an account? Register Here!

2025 TurkerView Privacy Terms Blog Contact