TurkerView
  • Requesters
  • Institutions
  • Scripts
  • Queuebicle
  • API
  • Qualifeye
  • Forum
  • Search
  • Login
  • Login
    • Action
    • Another action
    • Something else here
    • Separated link

Search TurkerView

  • Requesters
  • HITs
  • Scripts

Sorry, have to turn this off for a day to try and fix a query search bug!

cogneurolab(University of Iowa)

Is this your requester account?
No Institutional Affiliation
  • Overview
  • Reviews 11
  • HITs 35

cogneurolab(University of Iowa) Ratings


Workers feel this requester pays fairly

Poor Communication

Approves Quickly

Rejections Reported

No Blocks
Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.

cogneurolab(University of Iowa) Wage History


Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.
Heads up! We'll never hide reviews unless they violate our Terms of Service.

Top Worker Reviews

  • More
    • Best
    • Newest
    • Rejected
    • Hourly (High)
    • Hourly (Low)
    • My Reviews

Charlie Rose Proficient Worker
Reviews: 7,726
Points: 5,289
Ratings: 545
This HIT is for Worker (A3KK5FKG3L0Q66) only - All others will be rejected +5.00 bonus Confirmed!

Generous

Unrated

Approved

$562.50 / hour

00:00:32 / completion time

Pros

- Unless I get paid the base amount originally + bonus that I was originally owed, none. Will update.

Cons

- Poor communication / misunderstanding through emails over the course of 24 hours.
- Original HIT ran out of time and was longer than the given estimate since I was forced to continue in full screen mode (threats of rejection if leaving full screen, therefore not being able to check the timer) and ran out of time before given a completion code. Given I invested over 120 minutes in this HIT, I sent an email asking for a compensation HIT which they did not understand and said I would be compensated.
- At this point I'm not even sure I'm getting the original base payment (which was extremely underpaid without the bonus that made the task so long) along with the high-paying bonus I earned from the 90% rate I received in the task; well above the minimum 75% requirement.
Sep 29, 2021

Amanda Byas New Reviewer
Reviews: 1
Points: 10
Ratings: 8
(Behavioral study) How quickly and accurately can you respond to the letter on your screen? - $4.00

Fair

Unrated

Rejected

$8.35 / hour

00:28:44 / completion time
  • HIT Rejected

Pros

The pay was fair.

Cons

I wish there was more time to respond, at least a second and not have it move on after a milisecond. That happened quite a lot.

I wish the requster would have said you had to be above a certain % and not exclude more than x trials during the thing before rejecting.

Advice to Requester

You don't need to have us sign a form with our personal details as that is against TOS. Also put in that if you do not perform well, don't bother submitting as it will be rejected instead of letting people try this out and do their best and get a reject.
Dec 4, 2020 | 8 workers found this helpful.
cogneurolab(University of Iowa) (Requester) Rejection Feedback:

Your error rate is lower than 65% and/or the # of excluded trials are more than 100.


Nic Roberts Relaxed Pace
Reviews: 1,714
Points: 1,085
Ratings: 88
Quick response to colors ($8 for ~40min) - $8.00

Fair

Unrated

Approved

$10.64 / hour

00:45:07 / completion time

Pros

I enjoyed the task a bit, its interesting enough that the blocks move quickly and they are timed well, they don't feel like they are dragging on as some experiments do. Plenty of opportunities to take breaks as well. I paused several times, truly finished in 70 minutes but I estimate 45 minutes is how long I was working on it.

Cons

Could pay a little better but its fine.
Mar 30, 2021 | 1 worker found this helpful.

Want to see cogneurolab(University of Iowa)'s full profile?

Create Your Account

or Login

cogneurolab(University of Iowa)


A1JFK16PCYDVW3 MTurk Search Contact Requester

Recently Reviewed HITs


(Behavioral study) How quickly and accurately can you respond to the letter on your screen?
(Get paid up to $10!) Report the color of squares onscreen.
(Get paid up to $10!)/(Behavioral study) How quickly and accurately can you respond to the letter on your screen?
(pay up to $10)/(Behavioral study) How quickly and accurately can you respond to the letter on your screen?
Quick response to arrows ($8 for ~40min)

Ratings Legend

Wage Aggregates

Reward Sentiment

Communication Scores

Approval Tracking

Wage Aggregate Tracking

This is fairly straightforward: we take the completion time & the reward amount (where available) and calculate the average hourly rate for the task. We then apply that number to a simple range based on US minimum wage standards to color-code the data for easy to digest numerical data.

Color Pay Range (Hourly) Explanation
RED < $7.25 / hr Hourly averages below US Federal minimum wage
ORANGE $7.25 - $10.00 / hr Hourly averages between Federal & highest statewide (CA) minimum wages.
GREEN > $10.00 / hr Hourly averages above all US minimum wage standards

Reward Sentiment

Not all HITs are created equal. Sometimes an hourly wage doesn't convey the full story of a HIT's true worth, so we encourage workers to give their opinion on the overall pay of the task. Was it $8/hr to rate pictures of puppies? A worker could justifiably bump up the rating a bit for something so adorable. 10 hours locked in Inquisit? Even for $10/hr many workers would appreciate the heads up on such a task. The Pay Sentiment rating helps connect workers beyond the hard data.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Underpaid 1 / 5
  • Very low or no pay
  • Frustrating work experience
  • Inadequate instructions
Low 2 / 5
  • Below US min-wage ($7.25/hr)
  • No redeeming qualities to make up for pay
Fair 3 / 5
  • Minimum wages for task (consider SE taxes!)
  • Work experience offers nothing to tip the scales in a positive or negative direction
Good 4 / 5
  • Pay is above minimum wage, or compensates better than average for the level of effort required.
  • The overall work experience makes up for borderline wages
Generous 5 / 5
  • Pay is exceptional.
  • Interesting, engaging work or work environment
  • Concise instructions, well designed HIT.

Communication Ratings

Communication is an underrated aspect of mTurk. Clear, concise directions. A fast response to a clarification question or a resolution to a workflow suggestion can all be valuable aspects of interaction between Requesters & Workers and its worth keeping track of. Plus everyone enjoys the peace of mind knowing that if something does go wrong there will be an actual human getting back to you to solve the issue.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Unacceptable 1 / 5
  • No response at all
  • Rude response without a resolution
Poor 2 / 5
  • Responsive, but unhelpful
  • Required IRB or extra intervention
Acceptable 3 / 5
  • Responded in a reasonable timeframe
  • Resolves issues to a minimum level of satisfaction.
Good 4 / 5
  • Prompt Response
  • Positive resolution
Excellent 5 / 5
  • Prompt response time
  • Friendly & Professional
  • Helpful / Solved Issues
  • Interacts within the community

Approval Time Tracking

This rating is strictly for approval times. Let's face it, no one wants to mix approval time ratings with how fast a Requester rejects a HIT, so we've saved rejection flags for another category. This provides a more straightforward way to know about how long your HIT might sit pending before paying out. The default auto-approval for most MTurk tasks is 3 days, the maximum is 30 days. We've tried to base our ratings around those data-points.

Icon Rating Approval Time
Very Slow 1 / 5 Over 2 weeks
Slow 2 / 5 ~1 - 2 Weeks
Average 3 / 5 ~3 - 7 Days
Fast 4 / 5 ~1 - 3 Days
Very Fast 5 / 5 ~24 hours or less

Login

Login Failed! Please check your username/password and try again.
TurkerHub Member? Just use your normal TurkerHub credentials to log in to TurkerView.
Don't have an account? Register Here!

2025 TurkerView Privacy Terms Blog Contact