TurkerView
  • Requesters
  • Institutions
  • Scripts
  • Queuebicle
  • API
  • Qualifeye
  • Forum
  • Search
  • Login
  • Login
    • Action
    • Another action
    • Something else here
    • Separated link

Search TurkerView

  • Requesters
  • HITs
  • Scripts

Sorry, have to turn this off for a day to try and fix a query search bug!

Johannes Daxenberger

Is this your requester account?
No Institutional Affiliation
  • Overview
  • Reviews 97
  • HITs 101

Johannes Daxenberger Ratings


Workers feel this requester pays well

Unrated

Approves Quickly

No Rejections

Blocks Reported
Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.

Johannes Daxenberger Wage History


Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.
Heads up! We'll never hide reviews unless they violate our Terms of Service.

Top Worker Reviews

  • More
    • Best
    • Newest
    • Rejected
    • Hourly (High)
    • Hourly (Low)
    • My Reviews

Alexandra in VT Average Pace
Reviews: 8,350
Points: 5,826
Ratings: 671
Argument Annotation - Financial Reports Annotation (I) - $0.24

Good

Unrated

Approved

$11.52 / hour

00:01:15 / completion time

Pros

rate a handful of statements as either neutral, positive, or negative
pretty fast, easy enough, batch
the qual test isn't too hard

Cons

requires a qualification test (though this is positive in some cases, because it keeps other workers from gobbling them up as quickly)
not as awesome as some of their other HITs, slightly more difficult in that other HITs you could scan for keywords (such as negative tones in the "nappies") batch... for these ones, you really need to read the details because for some, a decrease is a good thing, and vice versa. overall, just takes a bit longer than some of their other HITs
Jan 10, 2020 | 5 workers found this helpful.

mbeattt Average Pace
Reviews: 2,015
Points: 1,562
Ratings: 55
Argument Similarity | Batch 2 - $0.20

Generous

Unrated

Approved

$16.00 / hour

00:00:45 / completion time

Pros

I love this requester, they had another batch a while back where I was rating the sentiment of people talking about pampers diapers and it was just as lucrative. I don't know why people are putting the QC bit into the cons, I feel like those are always the ones I get done in like 15 seconds, it feels like free money.

Cons

Dec 18, 2019 | 3 workers found this helpful.

dagodago11 Average Pace
Reviews: 69
Points: 245
Ratings: 42
Argument Similarity for Mobility topics (Batch 2) | Batch 2 - $0.18

Unrated

Unrated

Approved

$8.10 / hour

00:01:20 / completion time

Pros

The approval is fast and the HITs have an easy UI

Cons

Majority of these are kind of difficult
A lot of quality check questions are in broken English which makes them hard to understand which is the correct response.
Dec 15, 2021 | 2 workers found this helpful.

Want to see Johannes Daxenberger's full profile?

Create Your Account

or Login

Johannes Daxenberger


A1IR3V1ZRKLZH9 MTurk Search Contact Requester

Recently Reviewed HITs


Argument Annotation - 100 Sents/Topic Batch 5
Argument Annotation - 100 Sents/Topic Batch C.1
Argument Annotation - 100 Sents/Topic Batch C.3
Argument Annotation - Argument Annotation in review about tires (Batch 2)
Argument Annotation - Aspect Detection on Cars and Social Media (Batch 0)

Ratings Legend

Wage Aggregates

Reward Sentiment

Communication Scores

Approval Tracking

Wage Aggregate Tracking

This is fairly straightforward: we take the completion time & the reward amount (where available) and calculate the average hourly rate for the task. We then apply that number to a simple range based on US minimum wage standards to color-code the data for easy to digest numerical data.

Color Pay Range (Hourly) Explanation
RED < $7.25 / hr Hourly averages below US Federal minimum wage
ORANGE $7.25 - $10.00 / hr Hourly averages between Federal & highest statewide (CA) minimum wages.
GREEN > $10.00 / hr Hourly averages above all US minimum wage standards

Reward Sentiment

Not all HITs are created equal. Sometimes an hourly wage doesn't convey the full story of a HIT's true worth, so we encourage workers to give their opinion on the overall pay of the task. Was it $8/hr to rate pictures of puppies? A worker could justifiably bump up the rating a bit for something so adorable. 10 hours locked in Inquisit? Even for $10/hr many workers would appreciate the heads up on such a task. The Pay Sentiment rating helps connect workers beyond the hard data.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Underpaid 1 / 5
  • Very low or no pay
  • Frustrating work experience
  • Inadequate instructions
Low 2 / 5
  • Below US min-wage ($7.25/hr)
  • No redeeming qualities to make up for pay
Fair 3 / 5
  • Minimum wages for task (consider SE taxes!)
  • Work experience offers nothing to tip the scales in a positive or negative direction
Good 4 / 5
  • Pay is above minimum wage, or compensates better than average for the level of effort required.
  • The overall work experience makes up for borderline wages
Generous 5 / 5
  • Pay is exceptional.
  • Interesting, engaging work or work environment
  • Concise instructions, well designed HIT.

Communication Ratings

Communication is an underrated aspect of mTurk. Clear, concise directions. A fast response to a clarification question or a resolution to a workflow suggestion can all be valuable aspects of interaction between Requesters & Workers and its worth keeping track of. Plus everyone enjoys the peace of mind knowing that if something does go wrong there will be an actual human getting back to you to solve the issue.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Unacceptable 1 / 5
  • No response at all
  • Rude response without a resolution
Poor 2 / 5
  • Responsive, but unhelpful
  • Required IRB or extra intervention
Acceptable 3 / 5
  • Responded in a reasonable timeframe
  • Resolves issues to a minimum level of satisfaction.
Good 4 / 5
  • Prompt Response
  • Positive resolution
Excellent 5 / 5
  • Prompt response time
  • Friendly & Professional
  • Helpful / Solved Issues
  • Interacts within the community

Approval Time Tracking

This rating is strictly for approval times. Let's face it, no one wants to mix approval time ratings with how fast a Requester rejects a HIT, so we've saved rejection flags for another category. This provides a more straightforward way to know about how long your HIT might sit pending before paying out. The default auto-approval for most MTurk tasks is 3 days, the maximum is 30 days. We've tried to base our ratings around those data-points.

Icon Rating Approval Time
Very Slow 1 / 5 Over 2 weeks
Slow 2 / 5 ~1 - 2 Weeks
Average 3 / 5 ~3 - 7 Days
Fast 4 / 5 ~1 - 3 Days
Very Fast 5 / 5 ~24 hours or less

Login

Login Failed! Please check your username/password and try again.
TurkerHub Member? Just use your normal TurkerHub credentials to log in to TurkerView.
Don't have an account? Register Here!

2025 TurkerView Privacy Terms Blog Contact