TurkerView
  • Requesters
  • Institutions
  • Scripts
  • Queuebicle
  • API
  • Qualifeye
  • Forum
  • Search
  • Login
  • Login
    • Action
    • Another action
    • Something else here
    • Separated link

Search TurkerView

  • Requesters
  • HITs
  • Scripts

Sorry, have to turn this off for a day to try and fix a query search bug!

Ian Reed

Is this your requester account?
New York University
  • Overview
  • Reviews 223
  • HITs 12

Ian Reed Ratings


Workers feel this requester pays generously

Unrated

Approves Quickly

No Rejections

No Blocks
Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.

Ian Reed Wage History


Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.
Heads up! We'll never hide reviews unless they violate our Terms of Service.

Top Worker Reviews

  • More
    • Best
    • Newest
    • Rejected
    • Hourly (High)
    • Hourly (Low)
    • My Reviews

Calexit Average Pace
Reviews: 2,419
Points: 3,732
Ratings: 365
View pictures of faces and answer questions - $1.25

Low

Unrated

Approved

$10.32 / hour

00:07:16 / completion time

Pros

Rate a bunch of faces. I thought that they all looked constipated but that wasn't an option.

Cons

No progress bar, poorly designed survey.
The sliders all had two options for number 4.
The bubble questions all said to choose a certain number. It seemed like one huge attention check, so I clicked on that number even though it was not my response.
Feb 26, 2019

knottypiper Relaxed Pace
Reviews: 1,568
Points: 2,339
Ratings: 331
Gold Game - Play a game with someone else - $1.25

Generous

Unrated

Pending

$22.96 / hour

00:03:16 / completion time

Pros

Great pay for an easy task. Possible bonus of 50 cents. This should not take you even as long as it took me (I took my time).

Cons

Code does not stand out and is small, watch out for it.
Jan 24, 2018

ReebsC5 Average Pace
Reviews: 2,435
Points: 1,950
Ratings: 149
Personality and Word Search - $1.50

Unrated

Unrated

Approved

$14.10 / hour

00:06:23 / completion time

Pros

fairly easy

Cons

code is in debfriefing page AND didnt show up (did the "deprecated" thing.) Mentioned it in the box for comments and submitted anyway with the link as my code.
Mar 14, 2022

Want to see Ian Reed's full profile?

Create Your Account

or Login

Ian Reed


A1HJ5PVUHEY0W MTurk Search Contact Requester

Recently Reviewed HITs


Attractivness
Gold Game - Play a game with someone else
Gold Game - Play a game with someone else. Don't play if you've already played one of my games before!
Gold Game - Play a game with someone else. Don't play if you've already played one of my games before!
How funny is this comment?

Ratings Legend

Wage Aggregates

Reward Sentiment

Communication Scores

Approval Tracking

Wage Aggregate Tracking

This is fairly straightforward: we take the completion time & the reward amount (where available) and calculate the average hourly rate for the task. We then apply that number to a simple range based on US minimum wage standards to color-code the data for easy to digest numerical data.

Color Pay Range (Hourly) Explanation
RED < $7.25 / hr Hourly averages below US Federal minimum wage
ORANGE $7.25 - $10.00 / hr Hourly averages between Federal & highest statewide (CA) minimum wages.
GREEN > $10.00 / hr Hourly averages above all US minimum wage standards

Reward Sentiment

Not all HITs are created equal. Sometimes an hourly wage doesn't convey the full story of a HIT's true worth, so we encourage workers to give their opinion on the overall pay of the task. Was it $8/hr to rate pictures of puppies? A worker could justifiably bump up the rating a bit for something so adorable. 10 hours locked in Inquisit? Even for $10/hr many workers would appreciate the heads up on such a task. The Pay Sentiment rating helps connect workers beyond the hard data.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Underpaid 1 / 5
  • Very low or no pay
  • Frustrating work experience
  • Inadequate instructions
Low 2 / 5
  • Below US min-wage ($7.25/hr)
  • No redeeming qualities to make up for pay
Fair 3 / 5
  • Minimum wages for task (consider SE taxes!)
  • Work experience offers nothing to tip the scales in a positive or negative direction
Good 4 / 5
  • Pay is above minimum wage, or compensates better than average for the level of effort required.
  • The overall work experience makes up for borderline wages
Generous 5 / 5
  • Pay is exceptional.
  • Interesting, engaging work or work environment
  • Concise instructions, well designed HIT.

Communication Ratings

Communication is an underrated aspect of mTurk. Clear, concise directions. A fast response to a clarification question or a resolution to a workflow suggestion can all be valuable aspects of interaction between Requesters & Workers and its worth keeping track of. Plus everyone enjoys the peace of mind knowing that if something does go wrong there will be an actual human getting back to you to solve the issue.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Unacceptable 1 / 5
  • No response at all
  • Rude response without a resolution
Poor 2 / 5
  • Responsive, but unhelpful
  • Required IRB or extra intervention
Acceptable 3 / 5
  • Responded in a reasonable timeframe
  • Resolves issues to a minimum level of satisfaction.
Good 4 / 5
  • Prompt Response
  • Positive resolution
Excellent 5 / 5
  • Prompt response time
  • Friendly & Professional
  • Helpful / Solved Issues
  • Interacts within the community

Approval Time Tracking

This rating is strictly for approval times. Let's face it, no one wants to mix approval time ratings with how fast a Requester rejects a HIT, so we've saved rejection flags for another category. This provides a more straightforward way to know about how long your HIT might sit pending before paying out. The default auto-approval for most MTurk tasks is 3 days, the maximum is 30 days. We've tried to base our ratings around those data-points.

Icon Rating Approval Time
Very Slow 1 / 5 Over 2 weeks
Slow 2 / 5 ~1 - 2 Weeks
Average 3 / 5 ~3 - 7 Days
Fast 4 / 5 ~1 - 3 Days
Very Fast 5 / 5 ~24 hours or less

Login

Login Failed! Please check your username/password and try again.
TurkerHub Member? Just use your normal TurkerHub credentials to log in to TurkerView.
Don't have an account? Register Here!

2025 TurkerView Privacy Terms Blog Contact