TurkerView
  • Requesters
  • Institutions
  • Scripts
  • Queuebicle
  • API
  • Qualifeye
  • Forum
  • Search
  • Login
  • Login
    • Action
    • Another action
    • Something else here
    • Separated link

Search TurkerView

  • Requesters
  • HITs
  • Scripts

Sorry, have to turn this off for a day to try and fix a query search bug!

CAIDe Lab

Is this your requester account?
University of Oregon
  • Overview
  • Reviews 862
  • HITs 176

CAIDe Lab Ratings


Workers feel this requester pays well

Unrated

Approves Quickly

No Rejections

No Blocks
Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.

CAIDe Lab Wage History


Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.
Heads up! We'll never hide reviews unless they violate our Terms of Service.

Top Worker Reviews

  • More
    • Best
    • Newest
    • Rejected
    • Hourly (High)
    • Hourly (Low)
    • My Reviews

Yoyo Average Pace
Reviews: 68
Points: 1,899
Ratings: 186
Decision Making Study(~ 15 minutes) - $2.50

Low

Unrated

Approved

$10.91 / hour

00:13:45 / completion time

Pros

Can be done in slightly under 15 minutes.

Cons

Although it says there is a bonus, the bonuses do not pay out in the end.

Dozens upon dozens of choices you'll have to make.

Choose between two, such as:

*Guaranteed payout of 55 points
* 44% chance of 45 points or 56% chance of 75 points

You're then asked the exact same question, except instead of winning points one time, you win 100 based on your choice. You do this for every single question, and there's about 100 of them.

Worse still, half of the questions are in fractions, so you get questions like:

*Guaranteed payout of 42 points
* 44% chance of 18% of (0.32 X 297) points or 82% chance of (0.67 X 12) points

In the end, one of the choices you made is used to determine your payout. My payout was (0.32 X 297), which should be just over 95 points according to every calculator I've used. (I don't recall if the single choice or the 100x choice that was used, however. If it was the 100x, the payout should have been much higher.)

But in the end, it award me a total of 0.00 points. This makes no sense, as there should be no way to get no bonus, as even the lowest possible payouts guarantee you get at least a dozen points. The only explanation is that either the HIT is broken, or they don't award points to anyone who chooses a choice with a fraction in it, which is not stated anywhere in the survey, but that's the only thing I can reason.

Advice to Requester

Fix your payout system. Don't promise bonuses you can't deliver on.
Jun 8, 2022 | 3 workers found this helpful.

Hedgmog Careful Reader
Reviews: 10,159
Points: 22,045
Ratings: 1,426
Compensation HIT for A2Y0WNHMT4PZ4C(~ 1 minutes) - $1.75

Low

Unrated

Approved

$10.14 / hour

00:10:21 / completion time

Pros

This was compensation for "Decision Making Study Part 2" which was posted on October 5th. I had completed part of the hit but realized I had not read some of the graphs correctly. I wrote to the requester to see if I could redo the survey and returned the hit. I was unable to redo the survey but they offered to pay me for the work that I had already done. Fantastic requester and am so grateful for the compensation!. - time is estimated for the work I originally did for the hit in question - instant payment

Cons

Oct 15, 2021

j0sh83 Average Pace
Reviews: 5,419
Points: 12,340
Ratings: 1,213
Decision Making Study(~ 25 minutes) - $4.50

Good

Unrated

Approved

$17.74 / hour

00:15:13 / completion time

Pros

Faster than the stated estimate.

Many either/or gambles with a few questions per gamble. The first few have writing prompts. Short critical thinking section, followed by demographics at the end.

Cons

Repetitive.

Writing. Critical thinking. Math.

Directs you not to use a calculator, but if you are slow like me, doing basic math in your head for some of these does eat time.
Oct 28, 2021 | 1 worker found this helpful.

Want to see CAIDe Lab's full profile?

Create Your Account

or Login

CAIDe Lab


A1BLK7ESD41RLT MTurk Search Contact Requester
Top Collaborating Institutions

Oregon Health & Science University

Recently Reviewed HITs


Compensation HIT for A2Y0WNHMT4PZ4C(~ 1 minutes)
Decision Making Study (~ 10 minutes)
Decision Making Study (~ 15 minutes)
Decision Making Study (~ 5 minutes)
Decision Making Study (~15 minutes: non-mobile device only)(~ 15 minutes)

Ratings Legend

Wage Aggregates

Reward Sentiment

Communication Scores

Approval Tracking

Wage Aggregate Tracking

This is fairly straightforward: we take the completion time & the reward amount (where available) and calculate the average hourly rate for the task. We then apply that number to a simple range based on US minimum wage standards to color-code the data for easy to digest numerical data.

Color Pay Range (Hourly) Explanation
RED < $7.25 / hr Hourly averages below US Federal minimum wage
ORANGE $7.25 - $10.00 / hr Hourly averages between Federal & highest statewide (CA) minimum wages.
GREEN > $10.00 / hr Hourly averages above all US minimum wage standards

Reward Sentiment

Not all HITs are created equal. Sometimes an hourly wage doesn't convey the full story of a HIT's true worth, so we encourage workers to give their opinion on the overall pay of the task. Was it $8/hr to rate pictures of puppies? A worker could justifiably bump up the rating a bit for something so adorable. 10 hours locked in Inquisit? Even for $10/hr many workers would appreciate the heads up on such a task. The Pay Sentiment rating helps connect workers beyond the hard data.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Underpaid 1 / 5
  • Very low or no pay
  • Frustrating work experience
  • Inadequate instructions
Low 2 / 5
  • Below US min-wage ($7.25/hr)
  • No redeeming qualities to make up for pay
Fair 3 / 5
  • Minimum wages for task (consider SE taxes!)
  • Work experience offers nothing to tip the scales in a positive or negative direction
Good 4 / 5
  • Pay is above minimum wage, or compensates better than average for the level of effort required.
  • The overall work experience makes up for borderline wages
Generous 5 / 5
  • Pay is exceptional.
  • Interesting, engaging work or work environment
  • Concise instructions, well designed HIT.

Communication Ratings

Communication is an underrated aspect of mTurk. Clear, concise directions. A fast response to a clarification question or a resolution to a workflow suggestion can all be valuable aspects of interaction between Requesters & Workers and its worth keeping track of. Plus everyone enjoys the peace of mind knowing that if something does go wrong there will be an actual human getting back to you to solve the issue.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Unacceptable 1 / 5
  • No response at all
  • Rude response without a resolution
Poor 2 / 5
  • Responsive, but unhelpful
  • Required IRB or extra intervention
Acceptable 3 / 5
  • Responded in a reasonable timeframe
  • Resolves issues to a minimum level of satisfaction.
Good 4 / 5
  • Prompt Response
  • Positive resolution
Excellent 5 / 5
  • Prompt response time
  • Friendly & Professional
  • Helpful / Solved Issues
  • Interacts within the community

Approval Time Tracking

This rating is strictly for approval times. Let's face it, no one wants to mix approval time ratings with how fast a Requester rejects a HIT, so we've saved rejection flags for another category. This provides a more straightforward way to know about how long your HIT might sit pending before paying out. The default auto-approval for most MTurk tasks is 3 days, the maximum is 30 days. We've tried to base our ratings around those data-points.

Icon Rating Approval Time
Very Slow 1 / 5 Over 2 weeks
Slow 2 / 5 ~1 - 2 Weeks
Average 3 / 5 ~3 - 7 Days
Fast 4 / 5 ~1 - 3 Days
Very Fast 5 / 5 ~24 hours or less

Login

Login Failed! Please check your username/password and try again.
TurkerHub Member? Just use your normal TurkerHub credentials to log in to TurkerView.
Don't have an account? Register Here!

2025 TurkerView Privacy Terms Blog Contact