Nate Hodges Ratings
Nate Hodges Wage History
Top Worker Reviews
Randomacts Proficient Worker
Quick Survey Sunday, June 2, 2019 - $0.17
Underpaid
Unrated
Approved
$5.83 / hour
00:01:45 / completion time
Pros
It might lead to a qual like his stuff does.Cons
Underpaid trash writingconfusing
garbage
avoid
get out of my queue
Seriously the options for this are confusing as I don't have a response for a few so I just picked one after being confused for awhile.
His data from this will be useless as it deserves to be for the amount that he is paying us.
He used to be good and used to have great hits but that isn't the case anymore. I don't expect that he will return the the good hits so we are left with this underpaid garbage unless he does another closed qual but even then they haven't be really all that great in the past.
Jun 2, 2019 | 1 worker found this helpful.
ChrisTurk Fast Reader
Quick Survey Friday, October 27, 2017 - $3.00
Fair
Unrated
Pending
$7.97 / hour
00:22:35 / completion time
Pros
12 minutes of it is passive video watching, which is the only saving grace to the completion time.The content is legitimately interesting.
Cons
As with every other Nate, the layout is a sight to behold in the worst way. Button layouts are clumsy with no label/radio attachments to make selections easier or any thought put in beyond throwing inputs at the page.Had to rewatch content more than once with no warning that was going to be the case.
Oct 27, 2017 | 2 workers found this helpful.
ChrisTurk Fast Reader
Quick Survey Sunday, December 10, 2017 #2 - $8.00
Generous
Unrated
Pending
$16.77 / hour
00:28:37 / completion time
Pros
Video is 40 minutes long, though he says you can skim around. I just set it to 1.5x and watched the whole thing (save for the Borsai interview since it was in an earlier Nate).Show mostly sucked, except for the Kerner chat, but whatever $16/hr for some background crypto chat isn't bad.
Cons
Questions are typical poor formatting.
Dec 10, 2017 | 2 workers found this helpful.