TurkerView
  • Requesters
  • Institutions
  • Scripts
  • Queuebicle
  • API
  • Qualifeye
  • Forum
  • Search
  • Login
  • Login
    • Action
    • Another action
    • Something else here
    • Separated link

Search TurkerView

  • Requesters
  • HITs
  • Scripts

Sorry, have to turn this off for a day to try and fix a query search bug!

Kariyushi Rao

Verified
University of Chicago
  • Overview
  • Reviews 214
  • HITs 14

Kariyushi Rao Ratings


Workers feel this requester pays generously

Good Communication

Approves Quickly

No Rejections

No Blocks
Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.

Kariyushi Rao Wage History


Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.
Heads up! We'll never hide reviews unless they violate our Terms of Service.

Top Worker Reviews

  • More
    • Best
    • Newest
    • Rejected
    • Hourly (High)
    • Hourly (Low)
    • My Reviews

scoot412 Fast Reader
Reviews: 1,210
Points: 5,460
Ratings: 737
!!!START NOW!!! The Sales Game ($16+ for 60 minutes) - $6.00 +10.85 bonus Confirmed!

Fair

Unrated

Approved

$18.13 / hour

00:55:46 / completion time

Pros

There was a well-paid qual HIT for this a day prior $1.25 for maybe 5 mins)
Requester emailed reminder when this HIT was posted
With the bonus, the hourly turns out to be fair
After the bonus, it's worth it...especially early evening when I wasn't doing anything else anyway (probably would not do this during busy turk times, though)
Bonus paid roughly 30 minutes after submission

Cons

The projected one hour is pretty spot on. Pages are timed and you're "waiting" for others in the group, even if you finish first
TEDIOUS- pages are timed for 1 minute each; you have to respond in that amount of time or you lose that round. Miss too many responses and no bonus at all
Requires 100% attention. If you so much as tap another tab on your screen or look at another window (in my case, a word doc that I had open), you get a warning about staying on the page.
Oct 14, 2020 | 3 workers found this helpful.
Kariyushi Rao (Requester):

Thank you for sharing so much helpful information about this pair of HITs. Just wanted to clarify that you do get your performance bonus, and... your waiting room bonus, even if something happens and you end up missing the time limits on a few pages. It's just the $4.00 "active participation" bonus that you miss out on if too many pages are left without a response. I know it sucks that the $4.00 is withheld for "active participation" but I've tried a lot of different ways to keep everyone moving through the game at a good pace, and this was one of the most effective. I really just don't want people getting stuck waiting forever for others to catch up, which is also why we have the strict time limits.


HardWorkingTurker Fast Reader
Reviews: 523
Points: 2,128
Ratings: 122
20-minute experiment about predictions - $2.50

Generous

Unrated

Pending

$16.48 / hour

00:09:06 / completion time

Pros

I was shown 18 rounds of changes to an analyst's stock portfolio and asked to predict the 9th change for each round. The entire task took place within the iframe and was easy and fun. Great hourly rate.

Cons

There is a one page transcription task before the predictions. A lot of return reviews complained of a broken transcription task but I had no issues with it. It is possible the requester either fixed the issue or workers were possibly transcribing the first letter as a capital letter or adding extra spaces, but I could be wrong.
Feb 4, 2019

Vincent P Proficient Worker
Reviews: 162
Points: 140
Ratings: 34
45-minute game about learning and searching for solutions - $7.00 +4.39 bonus

Generous

Unrated

Approved

$20.69 / hour

00:33:02 / completion time

Pros

Decent pay with the bonus

Cons

EDIT: Okay, maybe I was a little ornery when I wrote up the cons. It's a good HIT and now I realize this is probably one of the best communicating requesters I've seen on the platform. Don't let me deter you from accepting work from this requester.
Sep 12, 2020 | 4 workers found this helpful.
Kariyushi Rao (Requester):

Thanks for sticking with it through the instructions, Vincent! I know these are tough. We've got to match up the information we give you to... a pretty strict abstract mathematical model of the game in order to test the hypothesis we have. I tried a few different versions of the instructions, and the current version seems to get people up to speed the best of what I've tried so far (based on the pass rate for the Comprehension Check). BUT - there is definitely room for improvement. If you have suggestions for improving the instructions, I would LOVE to get your feedback.


Want to see Kariyushi Rao's full profile?

Create Your Account

or Login

Kariyushi Rao


A18NBQ046IR47F MTurk Search Contact Requester

Recently Reviewed HITs


!!!START NOW!!! The Sales Game ($16+ for ~60 minutes)
!!!START NOW!!! The Sales Game ($16+ for 60 minutes)
10-minute experiment about predictions
10-minute experiment about responbibility judgments
20-minute experiment about predictions

Ratings Legend

Wage Aggregates

Reward Sentiment

Communication Scores

Approval Tracking

Wage Aggregate Tracking

This is fairly straightforward: we take the completion time & the reward amount (where available) and calculate the average hourly rate for the task. We then apply that number to a simple range based on US minimum wage standards to color-code the data for easy to digest numerical data.

Color Pay Range (Hourly) Explanation
RED < $7.25 / hr Hourly averages below US Federal minimum wage
ORANGE $7.25 - $10.00 / hr Hourly averages between Federal & highest statewide (CA) minimum wages.
GREEN > $10.00 / hr Hourly averages above all US minimum wage standards

Reward Sentiment

Not all HITs are created equal. Sometimes an hourly wage doesn't convey the full story of a HIT's true worth, so we encourage workers to give their opinion on the overall pay of the task. Was it $8/hr to rate pictures of puppies? A worker could justifiably bump up the rating a bit for something so adorable. 10 hours locked in Inquisit? Even for $10/hr many workers would appreciate the heads up on such a task. The Pay Sentiment rating helps connect workers beyond the hard data.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Underpaid 1 / 5
  • Very low or no pay
  • Frustrating work experience
  • Inadequate instructions
Low 2 / 5
  • Below US min-wage ($7.25/hr)
  • No redeeming qualities to make up for pay
Fair 3 / 5
  • Minimum wages for task (consider SE taxes!)
  • Work experience offers nothing to tip the scales in a positive or negative direction
Good 4 / 5
  • Pay is above minimum wage, or compensates better than average for the level of effort required.
  • The overall work experience makes up for borderline wages
Generous 5 / 5
  • Pay is exceptional.
  • Interesting, engaging work or work environment
  • Concise instructions, well designed HIT.

Communication Ratings

Communication is an underrated aspect of mTurk. Clear, concise directions. A fast response to a clarification question or a resolution to a workflow suggestion can all be valuable aspects of interaction between Requesters & Workers and its worth keeping track of. Plus everyone enjoys the peace of mind knowing that if something does go wrong there will be an actual human getting back to you to solve the issue.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Unacceptable 1 / 5
  • No response at all
  • Rude response without a resolution
Poor 2 / 5
  • Responsive, but unhelpful
  • Required IRB or extra intervention
Acceptable 3 / 5
  • Responded in a reasonable timeframe
  • Resolves issues to a minimum level of satisfaction.
Good 4 / 5
  • Prompt Response
  • Positive resolution
Excellent 5 / 5
  • Prompt response time
  • Friendly & Professional
  • Helpful / Solved Issues
  • Interacts within the community

Approval Time Tracking

This rating is strictly for approval times. Let's face it, no one wants to mix approval time ratings with how fast a Requester rejects a HIT, so we've saved rejection flags for another category. This provides a more straightforward way to know about how long your HIT might sit pending before paying out. The default auto-approval for most MTurk tasks is 3 days, the maximum is 30 days. We've tried to base our ratings around those data-points.

Icon Rating Approval Time
Very Slow 1 / 5 Over 2 weeks
Slow 2 / 5 ~1 - 2 Weeks
Average 3 / 5 ~3 - 7 Days
Fast 4 / 5 ~1 - 3 Days
Very Fast 5 / 5 ~24 hours or less

Login

Login Failed! Please check your username/password and try again.
TurkerHub Member? Just use your normal TurkerHub credentials to log in to TurkerView.
Don't have an account? Register Here!

2025 TurkerView Privacy Terms Blog Contact