TurkerView
  • Requesters
  • Institutions
  • Scripts
  • Queuebicle
  • API
  • Qualifeye
  • Forum
  • Search
  • Login
  • Login
    • Action
    • Another action
    • Something else here
    • Separated link

Search TurkerView

  • Requesters
  • HITs
  • Scripts

Sorry, have to turn this off for a day to try and fix a query search bug!

Michael J Starrett

Is this your requester account?
No Institutional Affiliation
  • Overview
  • Reviews 19
  • HITs 7

Michael J Starrett Ratings


Workers feel this requester pays well

Good Communication

Approves Quickly

No Rejections

No Blocks
Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.

Michael J Starrett Wage History


Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.
Heads up! We'll never hide reviews unless they violate our Terms of Service.

Top Worker Reviews

  • More
    • Best
    • Newest
    • Rejected
    • Hourly (High)
    • Hourly (Low)
    • My Reviews

bmt Proficient Worker
Reviews: 14,466
Points: 12,517
Ratings: 1,347
Spatial Learning and Navigation (Survey + Video game experiment) - $45.00

Good

Unrated

Approved

$20.27 / hour

02:13:14 / completion time

Pros

+ $45
+ I'm free
Description: Download an exe/dmg file (Win/Mac) and wander around a Unity-based 3D environment. Requester is from University of Arizona so I had no qualms about doing this. There are 6 rounds of 2 tasks: Spatial Learning and Spatial Pointing. Afterwards there's a quick demographics page on Qualtrics. My time includes the downloading of the file and the uploading of the information to their servers. You will like this hit if you like $45 and/or have good spatial visualization skills, i.e., you can build a map in your head.

Cons

- Satan ascended to inflict this HIT on me, personally
- Absolutely beyond tedious... the Spatial Learning wasn't too bad once I figured out where everything was, but the Pointing part went on forever, especially since I have no head for directions and it just repeated the same things over and over. 5 rounds would've been enough. 6 was taking the piss.
Sep 12, 2020 | 18 workers found this helpful.

Penelope Fast Reader
Reviews: 10,545
Points: 10,999
Ratings: 2,846
Spatial Learning and Navigation (Survey + Video game experiment) - $45.00

Good

Unrated

Approved

$24.13 / hour

01:51:55 / completion time

Pros

Simple just long.

Cons

Very tedious. Download a navigation game and play it six times. Code given after every round. Take your player to several different locations on a city model in overview mode. Then you are placed within the model and must determine where other stores are located based on wherever you are dropped. 56 times each round. You can probably shave off a few minutes if you can determine where you are in the first few rounds. Memorize locations and landscape of targeted area and it's easy to tell where the other buildings are. Took me three rounds to do that but it if you study the model in the first round you should be able to do it easily in all subsequent rounds. Just a hint: your man is always in a store's spot. I don't remember if that was in the instructions or not. Makes it much easier to answer the 56 x 6 questions.
Oct 16, 2020 | 5 workers found this helpful.

GucciCthulhu Relaxed Pace
Reviews: 42
Points: 104
Ratings: 7
Spatial Learning and Navigation (Survey + Video game experiment) - $45.00

Generous

Unrated

Approved

$22.50 / hour

02:00:00 / completion time

Pros

Super easy game, 3D space, wasd controls + mouse. Memorize the location of shops. Point the compass in the right direction using your memory. Completion time is shorter than what I have recorded I caught the HIT in the middle of lunch.

Cons

You have to download an application to do the HIT. You have to type in a code after each block as an attention check. It's a little boring, despite that, it's an excellent HIT.
Nov 30, 2020 | 1 worker found this helpful.

Want to see Michael J Starrett's full profile?

Create Your Account

or Login

Michael J Starrett


A18JDI8ARJQ4GE MTurk Search Contact Requester

Recently Reviewed HITs


Spatial Learning and Navigation (Survey + Video game experiment)

Ratings Legend

Wage Aggregates

Reward Sentiment

Communication Scores

Approval Tracking

Wage Aggregate Tracking

This is fairly straightforward: we take the completion time & the reward amount (where available) and calculate the average hourly rate for the task. We then apply that number to a simple range based on US minimum wage standards to color-code the data for easy to digest numerical data.

Color Pay Range (Hourly) Explanation
RED < $7.25 / hr Hourly averages below US Federal minimum wage
ORANGE $7.25 - $10.00 / hr Hourly averages between Federal & highest statewide (CA) minimum wages.
GREEN > $10.00 / hr Hourly averages above all US minimum wage standards

Reward Sentiment

Not all HITs are created equal. Sometimes an hourly wage doesn't convey the full story of a HIT's true worth, so we encourage workers to give their opinion on the overall pay of the task. Was it $8/hr to rate pictures of puppies? A worker could justifiably bump up the rating a bit for something so adorable. 10 hours locked in Inquisit? Even for $10/hr many workers would appreciate the heads up on such a task. The Pay Sentiment rating helps connect workers beyond the hard data.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Underpaid 1 / 5
  • Very low or no pay
  • Frustrating work experience
  • Inadequate instructions
Low 2 / 5
  • Below US min-wage ($7.25/hr)
  • No redeeming qualities to make up for pay
Fair 3 / 5
  • Minimum wages for task (consider SE taxes!)
  • Work experience offers nothing to tip the scales in a positive or negative direction
Good 4 / 5
  • Pay is above minimum wage, or compensates better than average for the level of effort required.
  • The overall work experience makes up for borderline wages
Generous 5 / 5
  • Pay is exceptional.
  • Interesting, engaging work or work environment
  • Concise instructions, well designed HIT.

Communication Ratings

Communication is an underrated aspect of mTurk. Clear, concise directions. A fast response to a clarification question or a resolution to a workflow suggestion can all be valuable aspects of interaction between Requesters & Workers and its worth keeping track of. Plus everyone enjoys the peace of mind knowing that if something does go wrong there will be an actual human getting back to you to solve the issue.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Unacceptable 1 / 5
  • No response at all
  • Rude response without a resolution
Poor 2 / 5
  • Responsive, but unhelpful
  • Required IRB or extra intervention
Acceptable 3 / 5
  • Responded in a reasonable timeframe
  • Resolves issues to a minimum level of satisfaction.
Good 4 / 5
  • Prompt Response
  • Positive resolution
Excellent 5 / 5
  • Prompt response time
  • Friendly & Professional
  • Helpful / Solved Issues
  • Interacts within the community

Approval Time Tracking

This rating is strictly for approval times. Let's face it, no one wants to mix approval time ratings with how fast a Requester rejects a HIT, so we've saved rejection flags for another category. This provides a more straightforward way to know about how long your HIT might sit pending before paying out. The default auto-approval for most MTurk tasks is 3 days, the maximum is 30 days. We've tried to base our ratings around those data-points.

Icon Rating Approval Time
Very Slow 1 / 5 Over 2 weeks
Slow 2 / 5 ~1 - 2 Weeks
Average 3 / 5 ~3 - 7 Days
Fast 4 / 5 ~1 - 3 Days
Very Fast 5 / 5 ~24 hours or less

Login

Login Failed! Please check your username/password and try again.
TurkerHub Member? Just use your normal TurkerHub credentials to log in to TurkerView.
Don't have an account? Register Here!

2025 TurkerView Privacy Terms Blog Contact