TurkerView
  • Requesters
  • Institutions
  • Scripts
  • Queuebicle
  • API
  • Qualifeye
  • Forum
  • Search
  • Login
  • Login
    • Action
    • Another action
    • Something else here
    • Separated link

Search TurkerView

  • Requesters
  • HITs
  • Scripts

Brigitte Everett

Is this your requester account?
The University of Sydney
  • Overview
  • Reviews 652
  • HITs 45

Brigitte Everett Ratings


Workers feel this requester pays well

Good Communication

Approves Quickly

No Rejections

No Blocks
Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.

Brigitte Everett Wage History


Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.
Heads up! We'll never hide reviews unless they violate our Terms of Service.

Top Worker Reviews

  • More
    • Best
    • Newest
    • Rejected
    • Hourly (High)
    • Hourly (Low)
    • My Reviews

Calexit Average Pace
Reviews: 2,268
Points: 3,560
Ratings: 345
What does the general population think about time biases? [1 OUP] - $0.50

Unrated

Unrated

Approved

$13.43 / hour

00:02:14 / completion time

Pros

Cons

Andrew James Latham

Mobile: +61 449 914 912

Email: andrew.latham@sydney.edu.au



(11) What if I have a complaint or any concerns?



Research involving humans in Australia is reviewed by an independent group of people called a Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC). The ethical aspects of this study have been approved by the HREC of the University of Sydney [Protocol Number]. As part of this process, we have agreed to carry out the study according to the National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research (2007). This statement has been developed to protect people who agree to take part in research studies.



If you are concerned about the way this study is being conducted or you wish to make a complaint to someone independent from the study, please contact the university using the details outlined below. Please quote the study title and protocol number.



The Manager, Human Ethics Administration, University of Sydney on +61 2 8627 8176 (Telephone); +61 2 8627 8177 (Facsimile) or ro.humanethics@sydney.edu.au (Email).
Aug 1, 2019

Hedgmog Careful Reader
Reviews: 10,154
Points: 22,004
Ratings: 1,384
What does the general population think about the future and reasoning about future truth values? - $2.00

Low

Unrated

Approved

$9.84 / hour

00:12:12 / completion time

Pros

Read a vignette - answer questions in relation to that vignette - you need to answer 3 out of the 4 questions correctly to proceed in the survey - on the next page answer another question in relation to the same vignette and an attention check question - read another vignette with the same instructions as before - some have completed this extremely quickly as for me I am just slow ;)!

Cons

Convoluted text and can be confusing if you are not concentrating - attention check questions - a lot of reading
Feb 28, 2022 | 1 worker found this helpful.

Hedgmog Careful Reader
Reviews: 10,154
Points: 22,004
Ratings: 1,384
What does the general population think about the future and reasoning about the past determining the future? - $2.00

Fair

Excellent

Approved

$17.06 / hour

00:07:02 / completion time

Pros

Read vignettes - answer questions in relation to the vignettes - I am sure this could be done quicker but due to the nature of the subject it took me a while to make sure I understood the text - same day approval - great communication with the requester as I wanted to check I could take this hit.

Cons

Convoluted text and can be confusing if you are not concentrating - attention check questions - a lot of reading
Mar 11, 2022

Want to see Brigitte Everett's full profile?

Create Your Account

or Login

Brigitte Everett


A15005Z8PFZD8T MTurk Search Contact Requester

Recently Reviewed HITs


[Shocking 1] What does the general population think about time biases?
[Shocking 2] What does the general population think about time biases?
[Shocking 3] What does the general population think about time biases?
[Shocking 4] What does the general population think about time biases?
What does the general population think about causation?

Ratings Legend

Wage Aggregates

Reward Sentiment

Communication Scores

Approval Tracking

Wage Aggregate Tracking

This is fairly straightforward: we take the completion time & the reward amount (where available) and calculate the average hourly rate for the task. We then apply that number to a simple range based on US minimum wage standards to color-code the data for easy to digest numerical data.

Color Pay Range (Hourly) Explanation
RED < $7.25 / hr Hourly averages below US Federal minimum wage
ORANGE $7.25 - $10.00 / hr Hourly averages between Federal & highest statewide (CA) minimum wages.
GREEN > $10.00 / hr Hourly averages above all US minimum wage standards

Reward Sentiment

Not all HITs are created equal. Sometimes an hourly wage doesn't convey the full story of a HIT's true worth, so we encourage workers to give their opinion on the overall pay of the task. Was it $8/hr to rate pictures of puppies? A worker could justifiably bump up the rating a bit for something so adorable. 10 hours locked in Inquisit? Even for $10/hr many workers would appreciate the heads up on such a task. The Pay Sentiment rating helps connect workers beyond the hard data.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Underpaid 1 / 5
  • Very low or no pay
  • Frustrating work experience
  • Inadequate instructions
Low 2 / 5
  • Below US min-wage ($7.25/hr)
  • No redeeming qualities to make up for pay
Fair 3 / 5
  • Minimum wages for task (consider SE taxes!)
  • Work experience offers nothing to tip the scales in a positive or negative direction
Good 4 / 5
  • Pay is above minimum wage, or compensates better than average for the level of effort required.
  • The overall work experience makes up for borderline wages
Generous 5 / 5
  • Pay is exceptional.
  • Interesting, engaging work or work environment
  • Concise instructions, well designed HIT.

Communication Ratings

Communication is an underrated aspect of mTurk. Clear, concise directions. A fast response to a clarification question or a resolution to a workflow suggestion can all be valuable aspects of interaction between Requesters & Workers and its worth keeping track of. Plus everyone enjoys the peace of mind knowing that if something does go wrong there will be an actual human getting back to you to solve the issue.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Unacceptable 1 / 5
  • No response at all
  • Rude response without a resolution
Poor 2 / 5
  • Responsive, but unhelpful
  • Required IRB or extra intervention
Acceptable 3 / 5
  • Responded in a reasonable timeframe
  • Resolves issues to a minimum level of satisfaction.
Good 4 / 5
  • Prompt Response
  • Positive resolution
Excellent 5 / 5
  • Prompt response time
  • Friendly & Professional
  • Helpful / Solved Issues
  • Interacts within the community

Approval Time Tracking

This rating is strictly for approval times. Let's face it, no one wants to mix approval time ratings with how fast a Requester rejects a HIT, so we've saved rejection flags for another category. This provides a more straightforward way to know about how long your HIT might sit pending before paying out. The default auto-approval for most MTurk tasks is 3 days, the maximum is 30 days. We've tried to base our ratings around those data-points.

Icon Rating Approval Time
Very Slow 1 / 5 Over 2 weeks
Slow 2 / 5 ~1 - 2 Weeks
Average 3 / 5 ~3 - 7 Days
Fast 4 / 5 ~1 - 3 Days
Very Fast 5 / 5 ~24 hours or less

Login

Login Failed! Please check your username/password and try again.
TurkerHub Member? Just use your normal TurkerHub credentials to log in to TurkerView.
Don't have an account? Register Here!

2023 TurkerView Privacy Terms Blog Contact