TurkerView
  • Requesters
  • Institutions
  • Scripts
  • Queuebicle
  • API
  • Qualifeye
  • Forum
  • Search
  • Login
  • Login
    • Action
    • Another action
    • Something else here
    • Separated link

Search TurkerView

  • Requesters
  • HITs
  • Scripts

Sorry, have to turn this off for a day to try and fix a query search bug!

Wladislaw Mill

Is this your requester account?
No Institutional Affiliation
  • Overview
  • Reviews 91
  • HITs 18

Wladislaw Mill Ratings


Workers feel this requester pays fairly

Unrated

Approves Quickly

No Rejections

No Blocks
Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.

Wladislaw Mill Wage History


Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.
Heads up! We'll never hide reviews unless they violate our Terms of Service.

Top Worker Reviews

  • More
    • Best
    • Newest
    • Rejected
    • Hourly (High)
    • Hourly (Low)
    • My Reviews

Penelope Fast Reader
Reviews: 10,545
Points: 10,999
Ratings: 2,846
Interesting study on negotiation behavior (roughly 40min). $1 reward + roughly $5.00 bonus (on average)(min.$0;max.$10). - $1.00 +1.00 bonus Confirmed!

Underpaid

Unrated

Pending

$2.95 / hour

00:40:43 / completion time

Pros

Screener for experiment tomorrow morning. Bonus up to $10 but $5 is more likely. Time includes 10 minutes for the initial hit plus 30 for the followup. The requester will "generously" bonus you $1 for completing the followup.

Cons

Did the followup. Waited 15 minutes for a partner. 11 rounds. One chosen for payment. You're dividing 100 tokens ($10) between yourself and another person and can send the offer to your partner who can accept or ignore it. There is a default payment option when no agreement is reached where your partner can either accept that (and it pays them $3-$6 and you $3-$6 - different for every round) or they can choose the option where you get 0 and they get 90 cents. SOMEHOW that round was chosen for my payment and so I received 0 and my partner 90 cents. This person would rather receive 90 cents than $3 or $4? The original default was $3 for him/her and $6 for me. During negotiation I had offered $4 for him/her and $6 for me. My partner offered $1 for me and $9 for him/her so neither of us accepted the other's offer. Either this was rigged or my partner was a complete moron.
Jul 7, 2020 | 1 worker found this helpful.

kimadagem Careful Reader
Reviews: 175
Points: 677
Ratings: 60
Simple 5-10min decision-making experiment with nice bonus - payment within a week - $0.50 +0.20 bonus

Underpaid

Unrated

Approved

$3.50 / hour

00:12:00 / completion time

Pros

Cons

- One of the final pages is set up with drop-down menus for the standard "Strongly Disagree" to "Strongly Agree" answer scale. This is slow and error-prone, and you can't see enough of your choice to be sure you picked what you wanted.
- Bonus is based on a random choice but the estimate provided at the end won't even take this to minimum wage.

Advice to Requester

Please, PLEASE don't use drop-down menus for answers on the standard Likert scale. There's too much chance you'll get unreliable data that way.
Oct 29, 2018 | 2 workers found this helpful.

Hedgmog Careful Reader
Reviews: 10,159
Points: 22,045
Ratings: 1,426
Quick study on perception (~10-15min). $2 reward + some bonus (up to 70cents). - $2.00 +0.40 bonus Confirmed!

Low

Unrated

Approved

$11.97 / hour

00:12:02 / completion time

Pros

Read instructions - mark images as per the instructions, if you answer correctly you get a 20c bonus - work through 11 tasks grading the images using slides as instructed - work through one page of pairs for every name you select correctly you earn 1c bonus - failed at the first bonus opportunity but gained 40c bonus on the pairs - could be done faster

Cons

Apr 12, 2022

Want to see Wladislaw Mill's full profile?

Create Your Account

or Login

Wladislaw Mill


A147EL9OQO4DJA MTurk Search Contact Requester

Recently Reviewed HITs


20-25min auction experiment - avg. bonus $2.10 (min.$0.43;max.$10)-payment within a week
5min decision making task - $1 reward + additional bonus
Experiment (~25/30min) on economic decision making - instant $1.00 reward plus bonus payment ($0.40-$3.50)
Interesting study on decision making (roughly 25min). \$2.50 reward + roughly $2 bonus (on average).
Interesting study on financial decision making (roughly 40min). $1 reward + roughly $5.50 bonus (on average)(min.$0.50;max.$10).

Ratings Legend

Wage Aggregates

Reward Sentiment

Communication Scores

Approval Tracking

Wage Aggregate Tracking

This is fairly straightforward: we take the completion time & the reward amount (where available) and calculate the average hourly rate for the task. We then apply that number to a simple range based on US minimum wage standards to color-code the data for easy to digest numerical data.

Color Pay Range (Hourly) Explanation
RED < $7.25 / hr Hourly averages below US Federal minimum wage
ORANGE $7.25 - $10.00 / hr Hourly averages between Federal & highest statewide (CA) minimum wages.
GREEN > $10.00 / hr Hourly averages above all US minimum wage standards

Reward Sentiment

Not all HITs are created equal. Sometimes an hourly wage doesn't convey the full story of a HIT's true worth, so we encourage workers to give their opinion on the overall pay of the task. Was it $8/hr to rate pictures of puppies? A worker could justifiably bump up the rating a bit for something so adorable. 10 hours locked in Inquisit? Even for $10/hr many workers would appreciate the heads up on such a task. The Pay Sentiment rating helps connect workers beyond the hard data.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Underpaid 1 / 5
  • Very low or no pay
  • Frustrating work experience
  • Inadequate instructions
Low 2 / 5
  • Below US min-wage ($7.25/hr)
  • No redeeming qualities to make up for pay
Fair 3 / 5
  • Minimum wages for task (consider SE taxes!)
  • Work experience offers nothing to tip the scales in a positive or negative direction
Good 4 / 5
  • Pay is above minimum wage, or compensates better than average for the level of effort required.
  • The overall work experience makes up for borderline wages
Generous 5 / 5
  • Pay is exceptional.
  • Interesting, engaging work or work environment
  • Concise instructions, well designed HIT.

Communication Ratings

Communication is an underrated aspect of mTurk. Clear, concise directions. A fast response to a clarification question or a resolution to a workflow suggestion can all be valuable aspects of interaction between Requesters & Workers and its worth keeping track of. Plus everyone enjoys the peace of mind knowing that if something does go wrong there will be an actual human getting back to you to solve the issue.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Unacceptable 1 / 5
  • No response at all
  • Rude response without a resolution
Poor 2 / 5
  • Responsive, but unhelpful
  • Required IRB or extra intervention
Acceptable 3 / 5
  • Responded in a reasonable timeframe
  • Resolves issues to a minimum level of satisfaction.
Good 4 / 5
  • Prompt Response
  • Positive resolution
Excellent 5 / 5
  • Prompt response time
  • Friendly & Professional
  • Helpful / Solved Issues
  • Interacts within the community

Approval Time Tracking

This rating is strictly for approval times. Let's face it, no one wants to mix approval time ratings with how fast a Requester rejects a HIT, so we've saved rejection flags for another category. This provides a more straightforward way to know about how long your HIT might sit pending before paying out. The default auto-approval for most MTurk tasks is 3 days, the maximum is 30 days. We've tried to base our ratings around those data-points.

Icon Rating Approval Time
Very Slow 1 / 5 Over 2 weeks
Slow 2 / 5 ~1 - 2 Weeks
Average 3 / 5 ~3 - 7 Days
Fast 4 / 5 ~1 - 3 Days
Very Fast 5 / 5 ~24 hours or less

Login

Login Failed! Please check your username/password and try again.
TurkerHub Member? Just use your normal TurkerHub credentials to log in to TurkerView.
Don't have an account? Register Here!

2025 TurkerView Privacy Terms Blog Contact