TurkerView
  • Requesters
  • Institutions
  • Scripts
  • Queuebicle
  • API
  • Qualifeye
  • Forum
  • Search
  • Login
  • Login
    • Action
    • Another action
    • Something else here
    • Separated link

Search TurkerView

  • Requesters
  • HITs
  • Scripts

Sorry, have to turn this off for a day to try and fix a query search bug!

liaepflturk

Is this your requester account?
No Institutional Affiliation
  • Overview
  • Reviews 81
  • HITs 111

liaepflturk Ratings


Workers feel this requester pays poorly

Poor Communication

Approves Quickly

Rejections Reported

No Blocks
Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.

liaepflturk Wage History


Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.
Heads up! We'll never hide reviews unless they violate our Terms of Service.

Top Worker Reviews

  • More
    • Best
    • Newest
    • Rejected
    • Hourly (High)
    • Hourly (Low)
    • My Reviews

Morgainne Proficient Worker
Reviews: 12,070
Points: 11,186
Ratings: 699
Looking for TikTok users to participate in our survey about user experience! - $3.00

Unrated

Acceptable

Approved

$65.85 / hour

00:02:44 / completion time

Pros

Update: Rejection reversed after the 30 day time limit since I was told they were contacting Amazon to see what could be done about that.

Cons

Update: My first message was ignored. I sent a second message last week days before the 30 day Amazon reversal limit. I sent it to the researcher address and their IRB. I finally received a response saying they knew the rejection reversal limit was over the timeframe but they would contact Amazon to see what could be done. I was not going to bother until I checked this page again seeing rejections were being overturned. So while a bit inconvenient I messaged them again to both departments, was polite, and explained what happened, so the outcome was positive. Would I work for them again? Unsure. Just glad this was reversed. I had also told them in a follow up communication that Amazon has indeed reversed rejections past 30 days citing the incident with mass rejections for a certain requester a while back. So as angry as I was it pays to be polite even when the rejection is not justified.

*sigh* No, I am not a new user. Sent a message. Do not expect this outcome to be positive. I had a bad feeling about this hit lol. Should have listened to my intuition.

Advice to Requester

If your criteria are so strict be more upfront about it on the hit page and have an automatic disqualification on the demographics page instead of allowing us to proceed with the survey.
Nov 14, 2022 | 5 workers found this helpful.
liaepflturk (Requester) Rejection Feedback:

You seem to be a new user to TikTok. Your usage time did not satisfy our criteria.

This rejection was overturned!


Codey d Ford Average Pace
Reviews: 4,713
Points: 2,167
Ratings: 101
Looking for TikTok users to participate in our survey about user experience! - $1.82

Generous

Unacceptable

Approved

$31.96 / hour

00:03:25 / completion time

Pros

We Won

Cons

scammer just wants free work
tiktok user rejecting everyone. contact them hci@epfl.ch
You spent less than 3 minutes to answer the 51 questions of our survey, which is significantly lower than the normal threshold.
when i spent over 3 minutes.They just want free work

Advice to Requester

u cant reject for not spending a certain amount of time on the questions
Dec 1, 2022 | 6 workers found this helpful.

Dylan15 Fast Reader
Reviews: 4,727
Points: 2,737
Ratings: 143
Looking for TikTok users to participate in our survey about user experience! - $1.82

Generous

Unrated

Approved

$36.81 / hour

00:02:58 / completion time

Pros

reversed rejection after I contact

Cons

rejected "You seem to be a new user to TikTok. Your usage time did not satisfy our criteria."
Emailed them and if they do not reverse rejection will be contacting there school...EPFL school in Europe
also contact email in survey is: hci@epfl.ch

Advice to Requester

you cant reject for that
Dec 1, 2022 | 5 workers found this helpful.

Want to see liaepflturk's full profile?

Create Your Account

or Login

liaepflturk


A134T7UJ7WTSL5 MTurk Search Contact Requester

Recently Reviewed HITs


Annotate Dialog Emotions (Possible adult content)
Annotate Question Intents in Dialogs
Aspect Sentiment Beer Reviews
Causal Assumption Evaluation
Causal Defeater Evaluation

Ratings Legend

Wage Aggregates

Reward Sentiment

Communication Scores

Approval Tracking

Wage Aggregate Tracking

This is fairly straightforward: we take the completion time & the reward amount (where available) and calculate the average hourly rate for the task. We then apply that number to a simple range based on US minimum wage standards to color-code the data for easy to digest numerical data.

Color Pay Range (Hourly) Explanation
RED < $7.25 / hr Hourly averages below US Federal minimum wage
ORANGE $7.25 - $10.00 / hr Hourly averages between Federal & highest statewide (CA) minimum wages.
GREEN > $10.00 / hr Hourly averages above all US minimum wage standards

Reward Sentiment

Not all HITs are created equal. Sometimes an hourly wage doesn't convey the full story of a HIT's true worth, so we encourage workers to give their opinion on the overall pay of the task. Was it $8/hr to rate pictures of puppies? A worker could justifiably bump up the rating a bit for something so adorable. 10 hours locked in Inquisit? Even for $10/hr many workers would appreciate the heads up on such a task. The Pay Sentiment rating helps connect workers beyond the hard data.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Underpaid 1 / 5
  • Very low or no pay
  • Frustrating work experience
  • Inadequate instructions
Low 2 / 5
  • Below US min-wage ($7.25/hr)
  • No redeeming qualities to make up for pay
Fair 3 / 5
  • Minimum wages for task (consider SE taxes!)
  • Work experience offers nothing to tip the scales in a positive or negative direction
Good 4 / 5
  • Pay is above minimum wage, or compensates better than average for the level of effort required.
  • The overall work experience makes up for borderline wages
Generous 5 / 5
  • Pay is exceptional.
  • Interesting, engaging work or work environment
  • Concise instructions, well designed HIT.

Communication Ratings

Communication is an underrated aspect of mTurk. Clear, concise directions. A fast response to a clarification question or a resolution to a workflow suggestion can all be valuable aspects of interaction between Requesters & Workers and its worth keeping track of. Plus everyone enjoys the peace of mind knowing that if something does go wrong there will be an actual human getting back to you to solve the issue.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Unacceptable 1 / 5
  • No response at all
  • Rude response without a resolution
Poor 2 / 5
  • Responsive, but unhelpful
  • Required IRB or extra intervention
Acceptable 3 / 5
  • Responded in a reasonable timeframe
  • Resolves issues to a minimum level of satisfaction.
Good 4 / 5
  • Prompt Response
  • Positive resolution
Excellent 5 / 5
  • Prompt response time
  • Friendly & Professional
  • Helpful / Solved Issues
  • Interacts within the community

Approval Time Tracking

This rating is strictly for approval times. Let's face it, no one wants to mix approval time ratings with how fast a Requester rejects a HIT, so we've saved rejection flags for another category. This provides a more straightforward way to know about how long your HIT might sit pending before paying out. The default auto-approval for most MTurk tasks is 3 days, the maximum is 30 days. We've tried to base our ratings around those data-points.

Icon Rating Approval Time
Very Slow 1 / 5 Over 2 weeks
Slow 2 / 5 ~1 - 2 Weeks
Average 3 / 5 ~3 - 7 Days
Fast 4 / 5 ~1 - 3 Days
Very Fast 5 / 5 ~24 hours or less

Login

Login Failed! Please check your username/password and try again.
TurkerHub Member? Just use your normal TurkerHub credentials to log in to TurkerView.
Don't have an account? Register Here!

2025 TurkerView Privacy Terms Blog Contact