TurkerView
  • Requesters
  • Institutions
  • Scripts
  • Queuebicle
  • API
  • Qualifeye
  • Forum
  • Search
  • Login
  • Login
    • Action
    • Another action
    • Something else here
    • Separated link

Search TurkerView

  • Requesters
  • HITs
  • Scripts

Sorry, have to turn this off for a day to try and fix a query search bug!

A. Mustafa Canan

Is this your requester account?
Naval Postgraduate School
  • Overview
  • Reviews 6
  • HITs 21

A. Mustafa Canan Ratings


Workers feel this requester pays poorly

Unrated

Approves Quickly

No Rejections

No Blocks
Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.

A. Mustafa Canan Wage History


Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.
Heads up! We'll never hide reviews unless they violate our Terms of Service.

Top Worker Reviews

  • More
    • Best
    • Newest
    • Rejected
    • Hourly (High)
    • Hourly (Low)
    • My Reviews

CurkoGreen777 Careful Reader
Reviews: 2,678
Points: 649
Ratings: 30
Decision Making in Human Machine Teams (HMT) - $3.00

Unrated

Unrated

Approved

$1.56 / hour

01:55:10 / completion time

Pros

update: Requestor sent bonus with a message of understanding and a apology.

Cons

I seriously power through this slave work to leave a review. This hit has over 30+ returns, all stating the disbelief of this requestor. The survey is composed of 8 blocks, with a brief demographics, each and every single image, answer, and result is timed by 10 seconds. Each block itself is around 25-40 minutes. There is an extreme LAG time with loading absolutely everything on this HIT, something that can be confirmed by many others. you CANNOT take a break, you take a break you will not have sufficient time to finish the HIT. The hit gives you 130 minutes, I finished at 115 minutes. The HIT itself is not difficult, could even have been enjoyable if not for the timer everything had, could have easily been a 45-60 minute HIT. If I get rejected for this HIT, I WILL NOT BE SURPRISED. I am posting this review while its PENDING, if its REJECTED, there is no further evidence needed to AVOID and BLOCK. I am giving them the benefit of the doubt.. and I do hope they are not trying to take more advantage of MTURK workers.

Advice to Requester

Please be transparent with expected time.
Aug 28, 2020 | 5 workers found this helpful.

legitimate11 Average Pace
Reviews: 51
Points: 194
Ratings: 37
Decision Making in Human Machine Teams (HMT) - $3.00

Underpaid

Unrated

Approved

$1.55 / hour

01:55:51 / completion time

Pros

Absolutely nothing

Cons

I thought this HIT would end eventually. I could not believe it kept going and going. I honestly felt that this HIT was perhaps a psychological test of endurance I was going to be surprised with a very large bonus at the end. Instead, I wasn't even provided a comment box at the end to explain that I was in complete disbelief to spend close to TWO hours for $3. I only kept going because of my own persistence and the hope that it would pay a bonus or something.
After submitting the HIT, I messaged the requester. I did not receive a response. I messaged them again today (8/29) and I am hoping for a response. It seems some people have been responded to and even got a bonus, I have not. In fact, my HIT is still marked as pending at this time. I am still extremely upset with how much time I wasted yesterday for this HIT and I will be furious if I never receive a response.
Aug 29, 2020 | 2 workers found this helpful.

TomB Relaxed Pace
Reviews: 166
Points: 350
Ratings: 39
Decision Making in Human Machine Teams (HMT) - $3.00

Underpaid

Unrated

Approved

$1.39 / hour

02:09:13 / completion time

Pros

Cons

This is probably the worst HIT I have worked on and that is saying something. The pages are timed and it takes forever. In addition, the last section was incorrectly code and automatically skipped sections and questions. It took the full two hours to complete and should have paid way much more. Stay away from this requester.
Aug 28, 2020 | 2 workers found this helpful.

Want to see A. Mustafa Canan's full profile?

Create Your Account

or Login

A. Mustafa Canan


A12CAVDYCA17LO MTurk Search Contact Requester

Recently Reviewed HITs


Decision Making in Human Machine Teams (HMT)
Human Decision-Making supported by Artificial Intelligence (AI)

Ratings Legend

Wage Aggregates

Reward Sentiment

Communication Scores

Approval Tracking

Wage Aggregate Tracking

This is fairly straightforward: we take the completion time & the reward amount (where available) and calculate the average hourly rate for the task. We then apply that number to a simple range based on US minimum wage standards to color-code the data for easy to digest numerical data.

Color Pay Range (Hourly) Explanation
RED < $7.25 / hr Hourly averages below US Federal minimum wage
ORANGE $7.25 - $10.00 / hr Hourly averages between Federal & highest statewide (CA) minimum wages.
GREEN > $10.00 / hr Hourly averages above all US minimum wage standards

Reward Sentiment

Not all HITs are created equal. Sometimes an hourly wage doesn't convey the full story of a HIT's true worth, so we encourage workers to give their opinion on the overall pay of the task. Was it $8/hr to rate pictures of puppies? A worker could justifiably bump up the rating a bit for something so adorable. 10 hours locked in Inquisit? Even for $10/hr many workers would appreciate the heads up on such a task. The Pay Sentiment rating helps connect workers beyond the hard data.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Underpaid 1 / 5
  • Very low or no pay
  • Frustrating work experience
  • Inadequate instructions
Low 2 / 5
  • Below US min-wage ($7.25/hr)
  • No redeeming qualities to make up for pay
Fair 3 / 5
  • Minimum wages for task (consider SE taxes!)
  • Work experience offers nothing to tip the scales in a positive or negative direction
Good 4 / 5
  • Pay is above minimum wage, or compensates better than average for the level of effort required.
  • The overall work experience makes up for borderline wages
Generous 5 / 5
  • Pay is exceptional.
  • Interesting, engaging work or work environment
  • Concise instructions, well designed HIT.

Communication Ratings

Communication is an underrated aspect of mTurk. Clear, concise directions. A fast response to a clarification question or a resolution to a workflow suggestion can all be valuable aspects of interaction between Requesters & Workers and its worth keeping track of. Plus everyone enjoys the peace of mind knowing that if something does go wrong there will be an actual human getting back to you to solve the issue.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Unacceptable 1 / 5
  • No response at all
  • Rude response without a resolution
Poor 2 / 5
  • Responsive, but unhelpful
  • Required IRB or extra intervention
Acceptable 3 / 5
  • Responded in a reasonable timeframe
  • Resolves issues to a minimum level of satisfaction.
Good 4 / 5
  • Prompt Response
  • Positive resolution
Excellent 5 / 5
  • Prompt response time
  • Friendly & Professional
  • Helpful / Solved Issues
  • Interacts within the community

Approval Time Tracking

This rating is strictly for approval times. Let's face it, no one wants to mix approval time ratings with how fast a Requester rejects a HIT, so we've saved rejection flags for another category. This provides a more straightforward way to know about how long your HIT might sit pending before paying out. The default auto-approval for most MTurk tasks is 3 days, the maximum is 30 days. We've tried to base our ratings around those data-points.

Icon Rating Approval Time
Very Slow 1 / 5 Over 2 weeks
Slow 2 / 5 ~1 - 2 Weeks
Average 3 / 5 ~3 - 7 Days
Fast 4 / 5 ~1 - 3 Days
Very Fast 5 / 5 ~24 hours or less

Login

Login Failed! Please check your username/password and try again.
TurkerHub Member? Just use your normal TurkerHub credentials to log in to TurkerView.
Don't have an account? Register Here!

2025 TurkerView Privacy Terms Blog Contact