TurkerView
  • Requesters
  • Institutions
  • Scripts
  • Queuebicle
  • API
  • Qualifeye
  • Forum
  • Search
  • Login
  • Login
    • Action
    • Another action
    • Something else here
    • Separated link

Search TurkerView

  • Requesters
  • HITs
  • Scripts

Sorry, have to turn this off for a day to try and fix a query search bug!

MMSP Konstanz

Is this your requester account?
No Institutional Affiliation
  • Overview
  • Reviews 22
  • HITs 110

MMSP Konstanz Ratings


Workers feel this requester pays very badly

Unrated

Approves Quickly

No Rejections

No Blocks
Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.

MMSP Konstanz Wage History


Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.
Heads up! We'll never hide reviews unless they violate our Terms of Service.

Top Worker Reviews

  • More
    • Best
    • Newest
    • Rejected
    • Hourly (High)
    • Hourly (Low)
    • My Reviews

perpetualotter New Reviewer
Reviews: 10
Points: 39
Ratings: 1
Compare the quality of image pairs - Flicker (Minimum screen resolution of 1920x1080 pixels required) - $0.75

Underpaid

Unrated

Pending

$3.48 / hour

00:12:56 / completion time

Pros

None that I can think of.

Cons

If you're able to get your resolution correct for this task (I used my monitor for this), you have to review 121 sets of photos and select which one flickers more. Some are obvious, some are much more subtle and it gets painful on the eyes trying to see a distinction. In addition, you see each set for five seconds and are not allowed to make your choice until they disappear - take too long and you may get rejected (believe it's after 5 skips).

Whilst a 75 cent batch hit looks good, the hourly rate is terrible.

Advice to Requester

Reduce the amount of images that need to be reviewed per hit, or increase the pay per hit.
Mar 18, 2023 | 1 worker found this helpful.

Larsanix Unreliably Fast
Reviews: 333
Points: 933
Ratings: 127
Quality Comparison of Image Pairs - $0.01

Underpaid

Unrated

Approved

$12.00 / hour

00:00:03 / completion time

Pros

.
.
Then they're actually decent.
Has approved all of my previous work.

Cons

One of the latest batches wants you to rate 8 different photos instead of the initial one, highly underpaid. The only ones worth doing are the single images.

Very short timer.

Can't tell if these are broken or if what they want is literally just reviews of that same image over and over again. If it is
<-------
Mar 17, 2020 | 1 worker found this helpful.

THFYM Proficient Worker
Reviews: 492
Points: 1,279
Ratings: 583
Dot Guessing Game - $0.01

Low

Unrated

Pending

$ / hour

00:00:04 / completion time

Pros

Easy.

Cons

Issa penny.
Have to view frame => accept insecure http to get the HIT to load (only have to do once though)
Dec 20, 2019 | 3 workers found this helpful.

Want to see MMSP Konstanz's full profile?

Create Your Account

or Login

MMSP Konstanz


A10KAUYQBRKPNM MTurk Search Contact Requester

Recently Reviewed HITs


Can you spot the image flickering? (Real Experiment, Dec.)
Can you spot the image flickering? (Study)
Can you spot the image flickering? (Traning Session, Dec.)
Compare Image Quality
Compare the quality of image pairs - Flicker (Minimum screen resolution of 1920x1080 pixels required)

Ratings Legend

Wage Aggregates

Reward Sentiment

Communication Scores

Approval Tracking

Wage Aggregate Tracking

This is fairly straightforward: we take the completion time & the reward amount (where available) and calculate the average hourly rate for the task. We then apply that number to a simple range based on US minimum wage standards to color-code the data for easy to digest numerical data.

Color Pay Range (Hourly) Explanation
RED < $7.25 / hr Hourly averages below US Federal minimum wage
ORANGE $7.25 - $10.00 / hr Hourly averages between Federal & highest statewide (CA) minimum wages.
GREEN > $10.00 / hr Hourly averages above all US minimum wage standards

Reward Sentiment

Not all HITs are created equal. Sometimes an hourly wage doesn't convey the full story of a HIT's true worth, so we encourage workers to give their opinion on the overall pay of the task. Was it $8/hr to rate pictures of puppies? A worker could justifiably bump up the rating a bit for something so adorable. 10 hours locked in Inquisit? Even for $10/hr many workers would appreciate the heads up on such a task. The Pay Sentiment rating helps connect workers beyond the hard data.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Underpaid 1 / 5
  • Very low or no pay
  • Frustrating work experience
  • Inadequate instructions
Low 2 / 5
  • Below US min-wage ($7.25/hr)
  • No redeeming qualities to make up for pay
Fair 3 / 5
  • Minimum wages for task (consider SE taxes!)
  • Work experience offers nothing to tip the scales in a positive or negative direction
Good 4 / 5
  • Pay is above minimum wage, or compensates better than average for the level of effort required.
  • The overall work experience makes up for borderline wages
Generous 5 / 5
  • Pay is exceptional.
  • Interesting, engaging work or work environment
  • Concise instructions, well designed HIT.

Communication Ratings

Communication is an underrated aspect of mTurk. Clear, concise directions. A fast response to a clarification question or a resolution to a workflow suggestion can all be valuable aspects of interaction between Requesters & Workers and its worth keeping track of. Plus everyone enjoys the peace of mind knowing that if something does go wrong there will be an actual human getting back to you to solve the issue.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Unacceptable 1 / 5
  • No response at all
  • Rude response without a resolution
Poor 2 / 5
  • Responsive, but unhelpful
  • Required IRB or extra intervention
Acceptable 3 / 5
  • Responded in a reasonable timeframe
  • Resolves issues to a minimum level of satisfaction.
Good 4 / 5
  • Prompt Response
  • Positive resolution
Excellent 5 / 5
  • Prompt response time
  • Friendly & Professional
  • Helpful / Solved Issues
  • Interacts within the community

Approval Time Tracking

This rating is strictly for approval times. Let's face it, no one wants to mix approval time ratings with how fast a Requester rejects a HIT, so we've saved rejection flags for another category. This provides a more straightforward way to know about how long your HIT might sit pending before paying out. The default auto-approval for most MTurk tasks is 3 days, the maximum is 30 days. We've tried to base our ratings around those data-points.

Icon Rating Approval Time
Very Slow 1 / 5 Over 2 weeks
Slow 2 / 5 ~1 - 2 Weeks
Average 3 / 5 ~3 - 7 Days
Fast 4 / 5 ~1 - 3 Days
Very Fast 5 / 5 ~24 hours or less

Login

Login Failed! Please check your username/password and try again.
TurkerHub Member? Just use your normal TurkerHub credentials to log in to TurkerView.
Don't have an account? Register Here!

2025 TurkerView Privacy Terms Blog Contact