TurkerView
  • Requesters
  • Institutions
  • Scripts
  • Queuebicle
  • API
  • Qualifeye
  • Forum
  • Search
  • Login
  • Login
    • Action
    • Another action
    • Something else here
    • Separated link

Search TurkerView

  • Requesters
  • HITs
  • Scripts

Sorry, have to turn this off for a day to try and fix a query search bug!

Engineering

Is this your requester account?
No Institutional Affiliation
  • Overview
  • Reviews 72
  • HITs 18

Engineering Ratings


Workers feel this requester pays fairly

Unrated

Approves Quickly

No Rejections

No Blocks
Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.

Engineering Wage History


Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.
Heads up! We'll never hide reviews unless they violate our Terms of Service.

Top Worker Reviews

  • More
    • Best
    • Newest
    • Rejected
    • Hourly (High)
    • Hourly (Low)
    • My Reviews

Larsanix Unreliably Fast
Reviews: 333
Points: 933
Ratings: 127
Transcribe simple form data - $0.06

Generous

Unrated

Approved

$21.60 / hour

00:00:10 / completion time

Pros

Requester seems to always adjust the way they present their HITs to create a more efficient workflow and fair hourly.
Auto-approval is usually the same day unless the HIT is marked for manual review.
Most of the time the information for extraction is made plain for you, so you don't have to search hard at all.

Cons

YMMV.
Might take some getting used to for others, but once you know what/where to look, it's really brainless work.
Apr 27, 2020 | 3 workers found this helpful.

00jane Careful Reader
Reviews: 637
Points: 607
Ratings: 21
Transcribe simple form data - $0.06

Unrated

Unrated

Approved

$6.55 / hour

00:00:33 / completion time

Pros

Prompt payment. Simple task. I like this requester; they've clearly put some thought into making this task quick and straightforward for workers.

Cons

Takes one or two instances to get the hang of it and move quickly. Short timer, so you can't just add it to your queue. Occasional scanning errors mean you need to check the main document.

Advice to Requester

Increase the task timer so workers can pick up the job in their queue and complete this simple task in down periods.
Jul 30, 2022

00jane Careful Reader
Reviews: 637
Points: 607
Ratings: 21
Transcribe simple form data - $0.06

Unrated

Unrated

Approved

$3.93 / hour

00:00:55 / completion time

Pros

Prompt approval. Simple task, once you're familiar with it.

Cons

Jul 20, 2022

Want to see Engineering's full profile?

Create Your Account

or Login

Engineering


A10GXSJ3DPMBGA MTurk Search Contact Requester

Recently Reviewed HITs


Extract Data From PDF Files
Transcribe checkbox values
Transcribe simple form data

Ratings Legend

Wage Aggregates

Reward Sentiment

Communication Scores

Approval Tracking

Wage Aggregate Tracking

This is fairly straightforward: we take the completion time & the reward amount (where available) and calculate the average hourly rate for the task. We then apply that number to a simple range based on US minimum wage standards to color-code the data for easy to digest numerical data.

Color Pay Range (Hourly) Explanation
RED < $7.25 / hr Hourly averages below US Federal minimum wage
ORANGE $7.25 - $10.00 / hr Hourly averages between Federal & highest statewide (CA) minimum wages.
GREEN > $10.00 / hr Hourly averages above all US minimum wage standards

Reward Sentiment

Not all HITs are created equal. Sometimes an hourly wage doesn't convey the full story of a HIT's true worth, so we encourage workers to give their opinion on the overall pay of the task. Was it $8/hr to rate pictures of puppies? A worker could justifiably bump up the rating a bit for something so adorable. 10 hours locked in Inquisit? Even for $10/hr many workers would appreciate the heads up on such a task. The Pay Sentiment rating helps connect workers beyond the hard data.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Underpaid 1 / 5
  • Very low or no pay
  • Frustrating work experience
  • Inadequate instructions
Low 2 / 5
  • Below US min-wage ($7.25/hr)
  • No redeeming qualities to make up for pay
Fair 3 / 5
  • Minimum wages for task (consider SE taxes!)
  • Work experience offers nothing to tip the scales in a positive or negative direction
Good 4 / 5
  • Pay is above minimum wage, or compensates better than average for the level of effort required.
  • The overall work experience makes up for borderline wages
Generous 5 / 5
  • Pay is exceptional.
  • Interesting, engaging work or work environment
  • Concise instructions, well designed HIT.

Communication Ratings

Communication is an underrated aspect of mTurk. Clear, concise directions. A fast response to a clarification question or a resolution to a workflow suggestion can all be valuable aspects of interaction between Requesters & Workers and its worth keeping track of. Plus everyone enjoys the peace of mind knowing that if something does go wrong there will be an actual human getting back to you to solve the issue.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Unacceptable 1 / 5
  • No response at all
  • Rude response without a resolution
Poor 2 / 5
  • Responsive, but unhelpful
  • Required IRB or extra intervention
Acceptable 3 / 5
  • Responded in a reasonable timeframe
  • Resolves issues to a minimum level of satisfaction.
Good 4 / 5
  • Prompt Response
  • Positive resolution
Excellent 5 / 5
  • Prompt response time
  • Friendly & Professional
  • Helpful / Solved Issues
  • Interacts within the community

Approval Time Tracking

This rating is strictly for approval times. Let's face it, no one wants to mix approval time ratings with how fast a Requester rejects a HIT, so we've saved rejection flags for another category. This provides a more straightforward way to know about how long your HIT might sit pending before paying out. The default auto-approval for most MTurk tasks is 3 days, the maximum is 30 days. We've tried to base our ratings around those data-points.

Icon Rating Approval Time
Very Slow 1 / 5 Over 2 weeks
Slow 2 / 5 ~1 - 2 Weeks
Average 3 / 5 ~3 - 7 Days
Fast 4 / 5 ~1 - 3 Days
Very Fast 5 / 5 ~24 hours or less

Login

Login Failed! Please check your username/password and try again.
TurkerHub Member? Just use your normal TurkerHub credentials to log in to TurkerView.
Don't have an account? Register Here!

2025 TurkerView Privacy Terms Blog Contact