TurkerView
  • Requesters
  • Institutions
  • Scripts
  • Queuebicle
  • API
  • Qualifeye
  • Forum
  • Search
  • Login
  • Login
    • Action
    • Another action
    • Something else here
    • Separated link

Search TurkerView

  • Requesters
  • HITs
  • Scripts

Sorry, have to turn this off for a day to try and fix a query search bug!

Aon mTurk

Is this your requester account?
No Institutional Affiliation
  • Overview
  • Reviews 346
  • HITs 163

Aon mTurk Ratings


Workers feel this requester pays fairly

Good Communication

Approves Quickly

No Rejections

No Blocks
Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.

Aon mTurk Wage History


Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.
Heads up! We'll never hide reviews unless they violate our Terms of Service.

Top Worker Reviews

  • More
    • Best
    • Newest
    • Rejected
    • Hourly (High)
    • Hourly (Low)
    • My Reviews

liladybugz26 Careful Reader
Reviews: 75
Points: 219
Ratings: 26
Cognitive Ability Equivalence Study (PC Only HIT)(~ 30 minutes) - $2.00

Good

Unrated

Approved

$11.76 / hour

00:10:12 / completion time

Pros

The academic portion of this study consisted of 10 math problems that were fairly easy, followed by a short assessment about the study's formatting. A maximum allotted time of 2.5 minutes per math question is given; however, it can be completed much, much more quickly. The math problems took me an average of under 30-seconds each.

Cons

I ran into some formatting issues near the end, including the tops of pages being cut-off, and a final option appearing asking if I wanted to review two unanswered questions. I answered every visible question including those at the bottom requiring scroll to see, but clicked on the option to go back and review them - just in case.

After clicking this, I was booted from the study and a page appeared asking me to log back in; this wasn't an option however, since no login credentials were ever created or used to access the study. After several more unsuccessful attempts at recovering my study, I exited the study, submit the HIT and emailed the requester with details about the problem. I'm currently awaiting a response.

Without this issue, the completion time would be much quicker, and payment fair to good.
Jan 5, 2022

Randomacts Proficient Worker
Reviews: 2,993
Points: 4,057
Ratings: 1,205
Take our new gamified tests (part 1 of 2)(~ 40 minutes) - $4.00

Fair

Unrated

Approved

$11.37 / hour

00:21:07 / completion time

Pros

The first and last game are fun imo and the rest are fairly painless outside of one of them imo.

Each game has a timer so even if you suck at it or it sucks you only will do it X min

Followup work is supposed be $8 comparable amount of work.

The requester mentions if you are low on time just submit and do when you can. The requester also says if stuff breaks submit and email ect . They are a great requester imo even if the pay can be lacking at times.


Hit approved nearly instantly.

Cons

The last game is a repeat of the first one only it is made in flash some reason? They clearly had the game made without flash but decided use flash here..

I got a nginx error partway through but refreshing the page allowed me continue working on the hit without losing any progress.
Jan 8, 2019

Birdlove Careful Reader
Reviews: 293
Points: 590
Ratings: 105
Take our new gamified tests (part 1 of 2)(~ 40 minutes) - $4.00

Unrated

Excellent

Pending

$4.77 / hour

00:50:18 / completion time

Pros

I had some issues with the hit more than halfway through. The requester is very reasonable and explains that if there are any issues to just submit the hit and contact them. They responded within minutes and gave me instructions to complete the hit, which worked!! Pay would be better if I could get through it faster but there is another part 2 with higher pay to look forward too. It was a fun hit as well!

Cons

The hit was slow to load the next pages so it went longer than it should have I think.
Jan 3, 2019

Want to see Aon mTurk's full profile?

Create Your Account

or Login

Aon mTurk


AYL89L70SAA5B MTurk Search Contact Requester

Recently Reviewed HITs


A Study about Video Interviews ($10 bonus for the 10 best candidates!)(~ 60 minutes)
ability test validation
Client Facing Behavior (~ 30 minutes)
Cognitive Ability Equivalence Study (PC Only HIT)(~ 30 minutes)
Cognitive Ability Equivalence Study (Smartphone Only HIT)(~ 30 minutes)

Ratings Legend

Wage Aggregates

Reward Sentiment

Communication Scores

Approval Tracking

Wage Aggregate Tracking

This is fairly straightforward: we take the completion time & the reward amount (where available) and calculate the average hourly rate for the task. We then apply that number to a simple range based on US minimum wage standards to color-code the data for easy to digest numerical data.

Color Pay Range (Hourly) Explanation
RED < $7.25 / hr Hourly averages below US Federal minimum wage
ORANGE $7.25 - $10.00 / hr Hourly averages between Federal & highest statewide (CA) minimum wages.
GREEN > $10.00 / hr Hourly averages above all US minimum wage standards

Reward Sentiment

Not all HITs are created equal. Sometimes an hourly wage doesn't convey the full story of a HIT's true worth, so we encourage workers to give their opinion on the overall pay of the task. Was it $8/hr to rate pictures of puppies? A worker could justifiably bump up the rating a bit for something so adorable. 10 hours locked in Inquisit? Even for $10/hr many workers would appreciate the heads up on such a task. The Pay Sentiment rating helps connect workers beyond the hard data.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Underpaid 1 / 5
  • Very low or no pay
  • Frustrating work experience
  • Inadequate instructions
Low 2 / 5
  • Below US min-wage ($7.25/hr)
  • No redeeming qualities to make up for pay
Fair 3 / 5
  • Minimum wages for task (consider SE taxes!)
  • Work experience offers nothing to tip the scales in a positive or negative direction
Good 4 / 5
  • Pay is above minimum wage, or compensates better than average for the level of effort required.
  • The overall work experience makes up for borderline wages
Generous 5 / 5
  • Pay is exceptional.
  • Interesting, engaging work or work environment
  • Concise instructions, well designed HIT.

Communication Ratings

Communication is an underrated aspect of mTurk. Clear, concise directions. A fast response to a clarification question or a resolution to a workflow suggestion can all be valuable aspects of interaction between Requesters & Workers and its worth keeping track of. Plus everyone enjoys the peace of mind knowing that if something does go wrong there will be an actual human getting back to you to solve the issue.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Unacceptable 1 / 5
  • No response at all
  • Rude response without a resolution
Poor 2 / 5
  • Responsive, but unhelpful
  • Required IRB or extra intervention
Acceptable 3 / 5
  • Responded in a reasonable timeframe
  • Resolves issues to a minimum level of satisfaction.
Good 4 / 5
  • Prompt Response
  • Positive resolution
Excellent 5 / 5
  • Prompt response time
  • Friendly & Professional
  • Helpful / Solved Issues
  • Interacts within the community

Approval Time Tracking

This rating is strictly for approval times. Let's face it, no one wants to mix approval time ratings with how fast a Requester rejects a HIT, so we've saved rejection flags for another category. This provides a more straightforward way to know about how long your HIT might sit pending before paying out. The default auto-approval for most MTurk tasks is 3 days, the maximum is 30 days. We've tried to base our ratings around those data-points.

Icon Rating Approval Time
Very Slow 1 / 5 Over 2 weeks
Slow 2 / 5 ~1 - 2 Weeks
Average 3 / 5 ~3 - 7 Days
Fast 4 / 5 ~1 - 3 Days
Very Fast 5 / 5 ~24 hours or less

Login

Login Failed! Please check your username/password and try again.
TurkerHub Member? Just use your normal TurkerHub credentials to log in to TurkerView.
Don't have an account? Register Here!

2025 TurkerView Privacy Terms Blog Contact