TurkerView
  • Requesters
  • Institutions
  • Scripts
  • Queuebicle
  • API
  • Qualifeye
  • Forum
  • Search
  • Login
  • Login
    • Action
    • Another action
    • Something else here
    • Separated link

Search TurkerView

  • Requesters
  • HITs
  • Scripts

Sorry, have to turn this off for a day to try and fix a query search bug!

Holly Levin-Aspenson

Is this your requester account?
No Institutional Affiliation
  • Overview
  • Reviews 8
  • HITs

Holly Levin-Aspenson Ratings


Workers feel this requester pays fairly

Unrated

Unrated

No Rejections

No Blocks
Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.

Holly Levin-Aspenson Wage History


Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.
Heads up! We'll never hide reviews unless they violate our Terms of Service.

Top Worker Reviews

  • More
    • Best
    • Newest
    • Rejected
    • Hourly (High)
    • Hourly (Low)
    • My Reviews

NBadger Fast Reader
Reviews: 2,823
Points: 3,157
Ratings: 769
Past Month Experiences Study(~ 60 minutes) - $3.50

Generous

Unrated

Pending

$15.57 / hour

00:13:29 / completion time

Pros

Fairly accurate progress bar, but demos are about 3/4 of the way through the line and then you jump to the end.

Cons

Very bubbly, plus has the added inconvenience of doing bubbles for a set of questions and then on the next page doing sliders for that exact same set of questions.
Jan 18, 2018 | 1 worker found this helpful.

knottypiper Relaxed Pace
Reviews: 1,568
Points: 2,339
Ratings: 331
Past Month Experiences Study(~ 60 minutes) - $3.50

Low

Unrated

Pending

$7.45 / hour

00:28:12 / completion time

Pros

Somewhat accurate progress bar.

Cons

Wow, did this feel long. It felt like it took twice the time it did, and I thought it would never end. Pages and pages of bubbles and slider bars.
Jan 18, 2018 | 1 worker found this helpful.

dan Average Pace
Reviews: 8,517
Points: 8,988
Ratings: 1,987
Past Month Experiences Study(~ 60 minutes) - $3.50

Unrated

Unrated

Pending

$13.19 / hour

00:15:55 / completion time

Pros

Pay was decent.

Cons

Long and lots of bubbles. Kept repeating the same question over and over. Occasionally you'd repeat the same question as a bubble - and then again as a slider. Annoying stuff.
Jan 18, 2018

Want to see Holly Levin-Aspenson's full profile?

Create Your Account

or Login

Holly Levin-Aspenson


APB3DXNS0UGOE MTurk Search Contact Requester

Recently Reviewed HITs


Past Month Experiences Study(~ 60 minutes)

Ratings Legend

Wage Aggregates

Reward Sentiment

Communication Scores

Approval Tracking

Wage Aggregate Tracking

This is fairly straightforward: we take the completion time & the reward amount (where available) and calculate the average hourly rate for the task. We then apply that number to a simple range based on US minimum wage standards to color-code the data for easy to digest numerical data.

Color Pay Range (Hourly) Explanation
RED < $7.25 / hr Hourly averages below US Federal minimum wage
ORANGE $7.25 - $10.00 / hr Hourly averages between Federal & highest statewide (CA) minimum wages.
GREEN > $10.00 / hr Hourly averages above all US minimum wage standards

Reward Sentiment

Not all HITs are created equal. Sometimes an hourly wage doesn't convey the full story of a HIT's true worth, so we encourage workers to give their opinion on the overall pay of the task. Was it $8/hr to rate pictures of puppies? A worker could justifiably bump up the rating a bit for something so adorable. 10 hours locked in Inquisit? Even for $10/hr many workers would appreciate the heads up on such a task. The Pay Sentiment rating helps connect workers beyond the hard data.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Underpaid 1 / 5
  • Very low or no pay
  • Frustrating work experience
  • Inadequate instructions
Low 2 / 5
  • Below US min-wage ($7.25/hr)
  • No redeeming qualities to make up for pay
Fair 3 / 5
  • Minimum wages for task (consider SE taxes!)
  • Work experience offers nothing to tip the scales in a positive or negative direction
Good 4 / 5
  • Pay is above minimum wage, or compensates better than average for the level of effort required.
  • The overall work experience makes up for borderline wages
Generous 5 / 5
  • Pay is exceptional.
  • Interesting, engaging work or work environment
  • Concise instructions, well designed HIT.

Communication Ratings

Communication is an underrated aspect of mTurk. Clear, concise directions. A fast response to a clarification question or a resolution to a workflow suggestion can all be valuable aspects of interaction between Requesters & Workers and its worth keeping track of. Plus everyone enjoys the peace of mind knowing that if something does go wrong there will be an actual human getting back to you to solve the issue.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Unacceptable 1 / 5
  • No response at all
  • Rude response without a resolution
Poor 2 / 5
  • Responsive, but unhelpful
  • Required IRB or extra intervention
Acceptable 3 / 5
  • Responded in a reasonable timeframe
  • Resolves issues to a minimum level of satisfaction.
Good 4 / 5
  • Prompt Response
  • Positive resolution
Excellent 5 / 5
  • Prompt response time
  • Friendly & Professional
  • Helpful / Solved Issues
  • Interacts within the community

Approval Time Tracking

This rating is strictly for approval times. Let's face it, no one wants to mix approval time ratings with how fast a Requester rejects a HIT, so we've saved rejection flags for another category. This provides a more straightforward way to know about how long your HIT might sit pending before paying out. The default auto-approval for most MTurk tasks is 3 days, the maximum is 30 days. We've tried to base our ratings around those data-points.

Icon Rating Approval Time
Very Slow 1 / 5 Over 2 weeks
Slow 2 / 5 ~1 - 2 Weeks
Average 3 / 5 ~3 - 7 Days
Fast 4 / 5 ~1 - 3 Days
Very Fast 5 / 5 ~24 hours or less

Login

Login Failed! Please check your username/password and try again.
TurkerHub Member? Just use your normal TurkerHub credentials to log in to TurkerView.
Don't have an account? Register Here!

2025 TurkerView Privacy Terms Blog Contact