TurkerView
  • Requesters
  • Institutions
  • Scripts
  • Queuebicle
  • API
  • Qualifeye
  • Forum
  • Search
  • Login
  • Login
    • Action
    • Another action
    • Something else here
    • Separated link

Search TurkerView

  • Requesters
  • HITs
  • Scripts

Sorry, have to turn this off for a day to try and fix a query search bug!

Behavioral Research

Is this your requester account?
North Carolina State University
  • Overview
  • Reviews 217
  • HITs 9

Behavioral Research Ratings


Workers feel this requester pays generously

Unrated

Approves Quickly

No Rejections

No Blocks
Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.

Behavioral Research Wage History


Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.
Heads up! We'll never hide reviews unless they violate our Terms of Service.

Top Worker Reviews

  • More
    • Best
    • Newest
    • Rejected
    • Hourly (High)
    • Hourly (Low)
    • My Reviews

Yekaterinburgskiy Yenot Average Pace
Reviews: 176
Points: 512
Ratings: 63
Take our Personality Test and Play Games! (Personality-Part 2)(~ 30 minutes) - $4.50

Generous

Unrated

Approved

$21.80 / hour

00:12:23 / completion time

Pros

Cons

Seemingly arbitrary rejection. I wrote to the requester for information as to why my HIT was not approved and received this answer:

Behavioral Research
research@behavioralscience.io
сегодня в 2:16
:

Hi, The only reason we reject HITs is if you did not enter in the correct completion code at the end.

Now, I am certain I copied and pasted the correct code. I can also see another review here where there were code problems on June 20, and that rejection was reversed. I wrote back to them and explained I did the work in good faith, described the HIT I completed, and asked them to find my work based on my worker ID number. I will edit this if I hear anything back.

I just recieved this, and will edit again when I hear more.
Behavioral Research
research@behavioralscience.io
сегодня в 2:56
:

Язык письма — Английский. Перевести на Русский?
Thank you. The issue you are referring to from June 20 has been resolved. I will check your worker ID and get back to you as soon as possible. Thanks!


Final Edit: The rejection was overturned.

Behavioral Research
research@behavioralscience.io
сегодня в 3:05
:

Hi
I checked your code and it does seem like something went wrong on our end. I have compensated you and reversed the rejection. Please let me know if you did not receive payment. I trust that most workers are like you and do their very best to complete surveys honestly and accurately. Please know that we also try to be fair requesters and pay fairly. If you ever run into something like this again with us, please do let us know. We want to make sure that those that take our surveys seriously are compensated fairly. Thanks for bringing this to our attention!
Jul 22, 2019
Behavioral Research (Requester) Rejection Feedback:

Your work did not meet our standards

This rejection was overturned!


glossolalia Fast Reader
Reviews: 64
Points: 71
Ratings: 19
Take our Personality Test and Play Games! (Games-Part 1)(~ 30 minutes) - $4.50

Unrated

Unrated

Approved

$7.71 / hour

00:35:00 / completion time

Pros

Cons

Took forever and was full of things that were not games at all, then they rejected me for the wrong code. Hopefully they'll reverse it.

Edit: they reversed it. Thanks!
Jun 20, 2019 | 2 workers found this helpful.
Behavioral Research (Requester) Rejection Feedback:

Incorrect Code

This rejection was overturned!


Troy Average Pace
Reviews: 9,095
Points: 9,888
Ratings: 1,150
Take our Personality Test and Play Games! (Games-Part 2)(~ 30 minutes) - $4.50

Generous

Unrated

Pending

$17.18 / hour

00:15:43 / completion time

Pros

Your hourly could be much better as the games go by super quick. I was pseudo taking my time and eating lunch between each game.

Cons

Jun 28, 2019 | 1 worker found this helpful.

Want to see Behavioral Research's full profile?

Create Your Account

or Login

Behavioral Research


A2UX6285R5JW62 MTurk Search Contact Requester

Recently Reviewed HITs


Play a balloon pumping game (~4 mins)
Play a decision game about making an exchange (~3 mins)
Play a game about choosing easy or hard options (~3 mins)
Play a game about choosing easy or hard options (~5 mins)
Play a game about choosing easy or hard options twice (~5 mins)

Ratings Legend

Wage Aggregates

Reward Sentiment

Communication Scores

Approval Tracking

Wage Aggregate Tracking

This is fairly straightforward: we take the completion time & the reward amount (where available) and calculate the average hourly rate for the task. We then apply that number to a simple range based on US minimum wage standards to color-code the data for easy to digest numerical data.

Color Pay Range (Hourly) Explanation
RED < $7.25 / hr Hourly averages below US Federal minimum wage
ORANGE $7.25 - $10.00 / hr Hourly averages between Federal & highest statewide (CA) minimum wages.
GREEN > $10.00 / hr Hourly averages above all US minimum wage standards

Reward Sentiment

Not all HITs are created equal. Sometimes an hourly wage doesn't convey the full story of a HIT's true worth, so we encourage workers to give their opinion on the overall pay of the task. Was it $8/hr to rate pictures of puppies? A worker could justifiably bump up the rating a bit for something so adorable. 10 hours locked in Inquisit? Even for $10/hr many workers would appreciate the heads up on such a task. The Pay Sentiment rating helps connect workers beyond the hard data.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Underpaid 1 / 5
  • Very low or no pay
  • Frustrating work experience
  • Inadequate instructions
Low 2 / 5
  • Below US min-wage ($7.25/hr)
  • No redeeming qualities to make up for pay
Fair 3 / 5
  • Minimum wages for task (consider SE taxes!)
  • Work experience offers nothing to tip the scales in a positive or negative direction
Good 4 / 5
  • Pay is above minimum wage, or compensates better than average for the level of effort required.
  • The overall work experience makes up for borderline wages
Generous 5 / 5
  • Pay is exceptional.
  • Interesting, engaging work or work environment
  • Concise instructions, well designed HIT.

Communication Ratings

Communication is an underrated aspect of mTurk. Clear, concise directions. A fast response to a clarification question or a resolution to a workflow suggestion can all be valuable aspects of interaction between Requesters & Workers and its worth keeping track of. Plus everyone enjoys the peace of mind knowing that if something does go wrong there will be an actual human getting back to you to solve the issue.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Unacceptable 1 / 5
  • No response at all
  • Rude response without a resolution
Poor 2 / 5
  • Responsive, but unhelpful
  • Required IRB or extra intervention
Acceptable 3 / 5
  • Responded in a reasonable timeframe
  • Resolves issues to a minimum level of satisfaction.
Good 4 / 5
  • Prompt Response
  • Positive resolution
Excellent 5 / 5
  • Prompt response time
  • Friendly & Professional
  • Helpful / Solved Issues
  • Interacts within the community

Approval Time Tracking

This rating is strictly for approval times. Let's face it, no one wants to mix approval time ratings with how fast a Requester rejects a HIT, so we've saved rejection flags for another category. This provides a more straightforward way to know about how long your HIT might sit pending before paying out. The default auto-approval for most MTurk tasks is 3 days, the maximum is 30 days. We've tried to base our ratings around those data-points.

Icon Rating Approval Time
Very Slow 1 / 5 Over 2 weeks
Slow 2 / 5 ~1 - 2 Weeks
Average 3 / 5 ~3 - 7 Days
Fast 4 / 5 ~1 - 3 Days
Very Fast 5 / 5 ~24 hours or less

Login

Login Failed! Please check your username/password and try again.
TurkerHub Member? Just use your normal TurkerHub credentials to log in to TurkerView.
Don't have an account? Register Here!

2025 TurkerView Privacy Terms Blog Contact