TurkerView

Yoo Yeon Sung

Is this your requester account?
No Institutional Affiliation

Yoo Yeon Sung Ratings

Workers feel this requester pays fairly

Good Communication

Approves Slowly

Rejections Reported

No Blocks
Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.

Yoo Yeon Sung Wage History

Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.

Top Worker Reviews

mdeem Average Pace
Choose the correct category for the video - $1.00

Fair

Unrated

Rejected (Unfair)

$10.78 / hour

00:05:34 / completion time
  • HIT Rejected

Pros

Cons

3/5 hits rejected with reason "You have missed the attention check questions. Please reread the consent form" - total lying on requester's part. I did these all the same day, how is it that I somehow missed the AC in the consent on 3 but not the other 2. I am extremely careful on this stuff, the req is dishonest

I have gone back and read the consent and there is absolutely nothing in there about an AC or related. Simply an I agree and that is all. I will be contacting their IRB :
University of Maryland College Park
Institutional Review Board Office
1204 Marie Mount Hall
College Park, Maryland, 20742
E-mail: irb@umd.edu
Telephone: 301-405-0678
Jul 18, 2021 | 9 workers found this helpful.
Hedgmog Careful Reader
Choose the correct category for the video - $1.00

Unrated

Excellent

Approved

$12.16 / hour

00:04:56 / completion time

Pros

Two videos to watch - mark which category they belong to followed by two other questions on each video - videos are only around a minute long - very simple - fair pay

Cons

Claimed that the result wasn't good enough. This is one of those hits that are very subjective, I have sent a message requesting further information - will update
06.18.2021-requesters communication is excellent and they decided to reverse the rejection
Jun 12, 2021 | 3 workers found this helpful.
Yuraino Fast Reader
Choose the correct category for the video - $1.00

Generous

Excellent

Approved

$19.78 / hour

00:03:02 / completion time

Pros

A lot of the videos were hilarious if you don't mind politics.

Cons

All 12 rejected for "not good enough answers".
Huh?
I reviewed the consent form and they had zero rejection threats. It looked pretty safe going in.
The HIT was quite subjective too and most of the videos were within the same 3 categories.
Contacted them through AMT for a solution and better reasoning. If no response, will contact the IRB that was provided in the consent.

EDIT 6/19: They reversed 5 out of 12 and gave full reasonings why they needed to reject.
EDIT2 6/21: They reversed everything now.
Jun 18, 2021 | 1 worker found this helpful.