TurkerView
  • Requesters
  • Institutions
  • Scripts
  • Queuebicle
  • API
  • Qualifeye
  • Forum
  • Search
  • Login
  • Login
    • Action
    • Another action
    • Something else here
    • Separated link

Search TurkerView

  • Requesters
  • HITs
  • Scripts

Sorry, have to turn this off for a day to try and fix a query search bug!

adrienne meredith tecza

Is this your requester account?
No Institutional Affiliation
  • Overview
  • Reviews 17
  • HITs

adrienne meredith tecza Ratings


Workers feel this requester pays generously

Poor Communication

Unrated

No Rejections

No Blocks
Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.

adrienne meredith tecza Wage History


Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.
Heads up! We'll never hide reviews unless they violate our Terms of Service.

Top Worker Reviews

  • More
    • Best
    • Newest
    • Rejected
    • Hourly (High)
    • Hourly (Low)
    • My Reviews

A6_Foul_Out Proficient Worker
Reviews: 11,139
Points: 7,554
Ratings: 1,587
Answer a survey about congressional elections - $1.25 +0.75 bonus Confirmed!

Generous

Unacceptable

Pending

$14.09 / hour

00:08:31 / completion time

Pros

Cons

Requested an additional $0.75 to make up to the wage promised in the info sheet for this survey. This was paid in a bonus.

Req took exception to this with attitude:

"Correct me if I am wrong, but when you started the HIT it informed you that you would be paid $1.25? In the future it would be best to not complete the HIT and alert the researcher to the discrepancy, rather than assume the higher amount."

When I told other people who took the same survey to ask for their promised wage, I got this back:

"I am now receiving several requests stating that a post to a forum let people know they could receive a bonus. You need to understand that researchers work on a very tight budget, and most people correctly understood the amount they would be paid ($1.25), which is generous by MTurk standards (i.e. more than $.10 a min). I apologized for the clerical error and paid you money for your confusion. Please be considerate of the fact that researchers are human and not take advantage of their mistakes."

Read your consent forms. Get what you were promised, because if the roles were reversed, you better be damn sure that they will claim that the info sheet is binding.
Apr 30, 2018 | 4 workers found this helpful.

ThisPoorGuy Average Pace
Reviews: 5,829
Points: 6,121
Ratings: 1,409
Answer a survey about congressional elections - $2.00

Generous

Unrated

Pending

$30.90 / hour

00:03:53 / completion time

Pros

Extremely generous payment. Pretty easy.

Cons

A little repetitive, but, nothing too bad.
Apr 2, 2018

Neven123 Fast Reader
Reviews: 19,139
Points: 10,259
Ratings: 774
Rate the appearance of politicians - $1.50

Generous

Unrated

Pending

$32.53 / hour

00:02:46 / completion time

Pros

Two Pages
No wrong answers
Encourages you to go fast

Cons

Jul 14, 2018

Want to see adrienne meredith tecza's full profile?

Create Your Account

or Login

adrienne meredith tecza


A2KNWFTJ7UW07H MTurk Search Contact Requester

Recently Reviewed HITs


Answer a survey about congressional elections
Answer a survey about your opinions of political candidate appearance
Rate the appearance of politicians

Ratings Legend

Wage Aggregates

Reward Sentiment

Communication Scores

Approval Tracking

Wage Aggregate Tracking

This is fairly straightforward: we take the completion time & the reward amount (where available) and calculate the average hourly rate for the task. We then apply that number to a simple range based on US minimum wage standards to color-code the data for easy to digest numerical data.

Color Pay Range (Hourly) Explanation
RED < $7.25 / hr Hourly averages below US Federal minimum wage
ORANGE $7.25 - $10.00 / hr Hourly averages between Federal & highest statewide (CA) minimum wages.
GREEN > $10.00 / hr Hourly averages above all US minimum wage standards

Reward Sentiment

Not all HITs are created equal. Sometimes an hourly wage doesn't convey the full story of a HIT's true worth, so we encourage workers to give their opinion on the overall pay of the task. Was it $8/hr to rate pictures of puppies? A worker could justifiably bump up the rating a bit for something so adorable. 10 hours locked in Inquisit? Even for $10/hr many workers would appreciate the heads up on such a task. The Pay Sentiment rating helps connect workers beyond the hard data.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Underpaid 1 / 5
  • Very low or no pay
  • Frustrating work experience
  • Inadequate instructions
Low 2 / 5
  • Below US min-wage ($7.25/hr)
  • No redeeming qualities to make up for pay
Fair 3 / 5
  • Minimum wages for task (consider SE taxes!)
  • Work experience offers nothing to tip the scales in a positive or negative direction
Good 4 / 5
  • Pay is above minimum wage, or compensates better than average for the level of effort required.
  • The overall work experience makes up for borderline wages
Generous 5 / 5
  • Pay is exceptional.
  • Interesting, engaging work or work environment
  • Concise instructions, well designed HIT.

Communication Ratings

Communication is an underrated aspect of mTurk. Clear, concise directions. A fast response to a clarification question or a resolution to a workflow suggestion can all be valuable aspects of interaction between Requesters & Workers and its worth keeping track of. Plus everyone enjoys the peace of mind knowing that if something does go wrong there will be an actual human getting back to you to solve the issue.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Unacceptable 1 / 5
  • No response at all
  • Rude response without a resolution
Poor 2 / 5
  • Responsive, but unhelpful
  • Required IRB or extra intervention
Acceptable 3 / 5
  • Responded in a reasonable timeframe
  • Resolves issues to a minimum level of satisfaction.
Good 4 / 5
  • Prompt Response
  • Positive resolution
Excellent 5 / 5
  • Prompt response time
  • Friendly & Professional
  • Helpful / Solved Issues
  • Interacts within the community

Approval Time Tracking

This rating is strictly for approval times. Let's face it, no one wants to mix approval time ratings with how fast a Requester rejects a HIT, so we've saved rejection flags for another category. This provides a more straightforward way to know about how long your HIT might sit pending before paying out. The default auto-approval for most MTurk tasks is 3 days, the maximum is 30 days. We've tried to base our ratings around those data-points.

Icon Rating Approval Time
Very Slow 1 / 5 Over 2 weeks
Slow 2 / 5 ~1 - 2 Weeks
Average 3 / 5 ~3 - 7 Days
Fast 4 / 5 ~1 - 3 Days
Very Fast 5 / 5 ~24 hours or less

Login

Login Failed! Please check your username/password and try again.
TurkerHub Member? Just use your normal TurkerHub credentials to log in to TurkerView.
Don't have an account? Register Here!

2025 TurkerView Privacy Terms Blog Contact