TurkerView
  • Requesters
  • Institutions
  • Scripts
  • Queuebicle
  • API
  • Qualifeye
  • Forum
  • Search
  • Login
  • Login
    • Action
    • Another action
    • Something else here
    • Separated link

Search TurkerView

  • Requesters
  • HITs
  • Scripts

Sorry, have to turn this off for a day to try and fix a query search bug!

Elwyn

Is this your requester account?
Stanford University
  • Overview
  • Reviews 56
  • HITs

Elwyn Ratings


Workers feel this requester pays generously

Good Communication

Approves Quickly

No Rejections

No Blocks
Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.

Elwyn Wage History


Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.
Heads up! We'll never hide reviews unless they violate our Terms of Service.

Top Worker Reviews

  • More
    • Best
    • Newest
    • Rejected
    • Hourly (High)
    • Hourly (Low)
    • My Reviews

scoot412 Fast Reader
Reviews: 1,210
Points: 5,460
Ratings: 737
20-minute Experiment on decision-making with bonus payment (by Stanford University) - $2.00 +1.80 bonus

Good

Good

Approved

$12.46 / hour

00:18:18 / completion time

Pros

This ran pretty smoothly, given that I was allegedly participating with several other random but "real" partners.
Approved and bonus paid within minutes of submission.
EDIT: I messaged the requester to point out the error in the instructions versus actual bonus calculation. Within minutes, I received an additional bonus. I'm not sure if this was related to my pointing out the error or if they'd already discovered the mistake and corrected it. Regardless, she sent an extra $1.20, bringing my total bonus to $1.80. That said, this requester seems to be honest and responsive. Ratings adjusted.

Cons

Waiting in between rounds made this one not pay so well.
The instructions indicated that bonus would be paid for TWO randomly selected rounds. However, when it revealed my bonus at the end, I was only given a bonus for one round and, naturally, it was the lowest paid round.

Advice to Requester

The bonus is promised for two rounds. You're apparently only granting a bonus for one round. Hopefully, you will fix this and make it right.
EDIT: Thank you for fixing the error and sending additional bonus!
Nov 10, 2018 | 1 worker found this helpful.

dan Average Pace
Reviews: 8,517
Points: 8,988
Ratings: 1,987
NOW OPEN - 20-minute Experiment on decision-making with bonus payment (by Stanford University) - $2.00 +3.00 bonus

Unrated

Unrated

Pending

$30.87 / hour

00:09:43 / completion time

Pros

You can do something else as you wait, just make sure you're paying attention. Bonus can be decent.

-edit bonus paid out shortly after completion - and was given twice as much as I thought I was getting. 3 dollars.

Cons

Lots of waiting around for a partner. Sometimes the rounds never happen because you can't get a partner.
Oct 27, 2018

Random Jobber Fast Reader
Reviews: 11,834
Points: 14,986
Ratings: 1,867
20-minute Experiment on decision-making with bonus payment (by Stanford University) - $2.00 +1.20 bonus Confirmed!

Generous

Unrated

Approved

$12.80 / hour

00:15:00 / completion time

Pros

Rough estimate because I got in early and had to wait for people to join.
Bonus received 15 minutes after submitting.

Cons

Bonuses based on a mix of your own and your partners' decisions, time to complete each round will vary depending on how quickly you/your partner make decisions
Oct 13, 2018 | 1 worker found this helpful.

Want to see Elwyn's full profile?

Create Your Account

or Login

Elwyn


A2HBLRK77MY3MP MTurk Search Contact Requester

Recently Reviewed HITs


20-minute Experiment on decision-making with bonus payment (by Stanford University)
20-minute Experiment on decision-making with bonus payment (by Stanford University) -- US only
Five minute survey on decision-making (Stanford University)
NOW OPEN - 20-minute Experiment on decision-making with bonus payment (by Stanford University)
OPEN - 20-minute Experiment on decision-making with bonus payment (by Stanford University)

Ratings Legend

Wage Aggregates

Reward Sentiment

Communication Scores

Approval Tracking

Wage Aggregate Tracking

This is fairly straightforward: we take the completion time & the reward amount (where available) and calculate the average hourly rate for the task. We then apply that number to a simple range based on US minimum wage standards to color-code the data for easy to digest numerical data.

Color Pay Range (Hourly) Explanation
RED < $7.25 / hr Hourly averages below US Federal minimum wage
ORANGE $7.25 - $10.00 / hr Hourly averages between Federal & highest statewide (CA) minimum wages.
GREEN > $10.00 / hr Hourly averages above all US minimum wage standards

Reward Sentiment

Not all HITs are created equal. Sometimes an hourly wage doesn't convey the full story of a HIT's true worth, so we encourage workers to give their opinion on the overall pay of the task. Was it $8/hr to rate pictures of puppies? A worker could justifiably bump up the rating a bit for something so adorable. 10 hours locked in Inquisit? Even for $10/hr many workers would appreciate the heads up on such a task. The Pay Sentiment rating helps connect workers beyond the hard data.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Underpaid 1 / 5
  • Very low or no pay
  • Frustrating work experience
  • Inadequate instructions
Low 2 / 5
  • Below US min-wage ($7.25/hr)
  • No redeeming qualities to make up for pay
Fair 3 / 5
  • Minimum wages for task (consider SE taxes!)
  • Work experience offers nothing to tip the scales in a positive or negative direction
Good 4 / 5
  • Pay is above minimum wage, or compensates better than average for the level of effort required.
  • The overall work experience makes up for borderline wages
Generous 5 / 5
  • Pay is exceptional.
  • Interesting, engaging work or work environment
  • Concise instructions, well designed HIT.

Communication Ratings

Communication is an underrated aspect of mTurk. Clear, concise directions. A fast response to a clarification question or a resolution to a workflow suggestion can all be valuable aspects of interaction between Requesters & Workers and its worth keeping track of. Plus everyone enjoys the peace of mind knowing that if something does go wrong there will be an actual human getting back to you to solve the issue.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Unacceptable 1 / 5
  • No response at all
  • Rude response without a resolution
Poor 2 / 5
  • Responsive, but unhelpful
  • Required IRB or extra intervention
Acceptable 3 / 5
  • Responded in a reasonable timeframe
  • Resolves issues to a minimum level of satisfaction.
Good 4 / 5
  • Prompt Response
  • Positive resolution
Excellent 5 / 5
  • Prompt response time
  • Friendly & Professional
  • Helpful / Solved Issues
  • Interacts within the community

Approval Time Tracking

This rating is strictly for approval times. Let's face it, no one wants to mix approval time ratings with how fast a Requester rejects a HIT, so we've saved rejection flags for another category. This provides a more straightforward way to know about how long your HIT might sit pending before paying out. The default auto-approval for most MTurk tasks is 3 days, the maximum is 30 days. We've tried to base our ratings around those data-points.

Icon Rating Approval Time
Very Slow 1 / 5 Over 2 weeks
Slow 2 / 5 ~1 - 2 Weeks
Average 3 / 5 ~3 - 7 Days
Fast 4 / 5 ~1 - 3 Days
Very Fast 5 / 5 ~24 hours or less

Login

Login Failed! Please check your username/password and try again.
TurkerHub Member? Just use your normal TurkerHub credentials to log in to TurkerView.
Don't have an account? Register Here!

2025 TurkerView Privacy Terms Blog Contact