TurkerView
  • Requesters
  • Institutions
  • Scripts
  • Queuebicle
  • API
  • Qualifeye
  • Forum
  • Search
  • Login
  • Login
    • Action
    • Another action
    • Something else here
    • Separated link

Search TurkerView

  • Requesters
  • HITs
  • Scripts

Sorry, have to turn this off for a day to try and fix a query search bug!

John Medaglia

Is this your requester account?
University of Pennsylvania
  • Overview
  • Reviews 84
  • HITs 28

John Medaglia Ratings


Workers feel this requester pays well

Good Communication

Approves Quickly

No Rejections

No Blocks
Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.

John Medaglia Wage History


Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.
Heads up! We'll never hide reviews unless they violate our Terms of Service.

Top Worker Reviews

  • More
    • Best
    • Newest
    • Rejected
    • Hourly (High)
    • Hourly (Low)
    • My Reviews

Mizu Average Pace
Reviews: 1,099
Points: 1,183
Ratings: 75
Could make $1-$30 on a study about fatigue. 30 min. Answer surveys and perform a task; must meet criteria, see below - $1.00 +29.00 bonus Confirmed!

Unrated

Good

Approved

$58.89 / hour

00:30:34 / completion time

Pros

Fast approval and simple HIT. Original bonus of $18.
Requester response on the bonus
"You received $30 for completing the task - it's a variable pay where workers can receive $1-$30 and those who completed the task in your batch received $30. I've heard from several workers that they expect $18 likely due to the online reviews, however, the bonus is variable as stated in the HIT title. "

Cons

Shows a blank page after you submit data so you don't know if it went through.
Bonus does not seem to depend on performance?
2 days and still have not received bonus after approval.
10/26 - Contacted requester on both Mturk and his Email regarding the bonus with no reply.
11/1 - Contacted requester via Turkerview
11/1 update - Requester replied to the Turkerview message and approved bonus. I guess the best way to contact them is through Turkerview. Requester increased my bonus since the bonus was delayed and was an error in their systems.
Oct 20, 2021 | 3 workers found this helpful.

scoot412 Fast Reader
Reviews: 1,210
Points: 5,460
Ratings: 737
Earn up to $50 for a 1-1.5 hour study about fatigue -- answer surveys about fatigue and perform a mental task - $10.00 +40.00 bonus Confirmed!

Generous

Unrated

Approved

$61.58 / hour

00:48:43 / completion time

Pros

With the bonus, the pay is excellent on this HIT
A survey which takes about ten minutes, all bubbles
Then there is a keyboard task that takes probably 30-40 minutes
Approved and $40 bonus received roughly one day after submission

Cons

No progress bar on survey (RedHat site) or on the task.
Keyboard task is a repetitive and boring but, not too bad
Experiment happens in full screen, requires complete focus
Asks for name and DOB
Nov 20, 2020 | 3 workers found this helpful.

wampus New Reviewer
Reviews: 11
Points: 40
Ratings: 18
Could make $1-$30 on a study about fatigue. 30 min. Answer surveys and perform a task; must meet criteria, see below - $1.00 +18.00 bonus

Good

Good

Approved

$40.76 / hour

00:27:58 / completion time

Pros

Not the hardest task in the world. The $18 bonus makes the time spent worthwhile. Fast approval.

Cons

There's some uncertainty regarding the bonus value and as others have mentioned, the end is just a blank white screen that leaves things feeling a little unfinished.
Oct 25, 2021 | 1 worker found this helpful.

Want to see John Medaglia's full profile?

Create Your Account

or Login

John Medaglia


A2A5NTRPZXJE8K MTurk Search Contact Requester

Recently Reviewed HITs


Could make $1-$30 on a study about fatigue. 30 min. Answer surveys and perform a task; must meet criteria, see below
Earn up to $50 for a 1-1.5 hour study about fatigue -- answer surveys about fatigue and perform a mental task
How would you optimize thinking abilities in others?(~ 35 minutes)
Neuroethics Decision-Making Task in repairing cognitive dysfunctionns
Neuroethics Decision-Making Task: Treating Cognitive Dysfunctions

Ratings Legend

Wage Aggregates

Reward Sentiment

Communication Scores

Approval Tracking

Wage Aggregate Tracking

This is fairly straightforward: we take the completion time & the reward amount (where available) and calculate the average hourly rate for the task. We then apply that number to a simple range based on US minimum wage standards to color-code the data for easy to digest numerical data.

Color Pay Range (Hourly) Explanation
RED < $7.25 / hr Hourly averages below US Federal minimum wage
ORANGE $7.25 - $10.00 / hr Hourly averages between Federal & highest statewide (CA) minimum wages.
GREEN > $10.00 / hr Hourly averages above all US minimum wage standards

Reward Sentiment

Not all HITs are created equal. Sometimes an hourly wage doesn't convey the full story of a HIT's true worth, so we encourage workers to give their opinion on the overall pay of the task. Was it $8/hr to rate pictures of puppies? A worker could justifiably bump up the rating a bit for something so adorable. 10 hours locked in Inquisit? Even for $10/hr many workers would appreciate the heads up on such a task. The Pay Sentiment rating helps connect workers beyond the hard data.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Underpaid 1 / 5
  • Very low or no pay
  • Frustrating work experience
  • Inadequate instructions
Low 2 / 5
  • Below US min-wage ($7.25/hr)
  • No redeeming qualities to make up for pay
Fair 3 / 5
  • Minimum wages for task (consider SE taxes!)
  • Work experience offers nothing to tip the scales in a positive or negative direction
Good 4 / 5
  • Pay is above minimum wage, or compensates better than average for the level of effort required.
  • The overall work experience makes up for borderline wages
Generous 5 / 5
  • Pay is exceptional.
  • Interesting, engaging work or work environment
  • Concise instructions, well designed HIT.

Communication Ratings

Communication is an underrated aspect of mTurk. Clear, concise directions. A fast response to a clarification question or a resolution to a workflow suggestion can all be valuable aspects of interaction between Requesters & Workers and its worth keeping track of. Plus everyone enjoys the peace of mind knowing that if something does go wrong there will be an actual human getting back to you to solve the issue.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Unacceptable 1 / 5
  • No response at all
  • Rude response without a resolution
Poor 2 / 5
  • Responsive, but unhelpful
  • Required IRB or extra intervention
Acceptable 3 / 5
  • Responded in a reasonable timeframe
  • Resolves issues to a minimum level of satisfaction.
Good 4 / 5
  • Prompt Response
  • Positive resolution
Excellent 5 / 5
  • Prompt response time
  • Friendly & Professional
  • Helpful / Solved Issues
  • Interacts within the community

Approval Time Tracking

This rating is strictly for approval times. Let's face it, no one wants to mix approval time ratings with how fast a Requester rejects a HIT, so we've saved rejection flags for another category. This provides a more straightforward way to know about how long your HIT might sit pending before paying out. The default auto-approval for most MTurk tasks is 3 days, the maximum is 30 days. We've tried to base our ratings around those data-points.

Icon Rating Approval Time
Very Slow 1 / 5 Over 2 weeks
Slow 2 / 5 ~1 - 2 Weeks
Average 3 / 5 ~3 - 7 Days
Fast 4 / 5 ~1 - 3 Days
Very Fast 5 / 5 ~24 hours or less

Login

Login Failed! Please check your username/password and try again.
TurkerHub Member? Just use your normal TurkerHub credentials to log in to TurkerView.
Don't have an account? Register Here!

2025 TurkerView Privacy Terms Blog Contact