TurkerView
  • Requesters
  • Institutions
  • Scripts
  • Queuebicle
  • API
  • Qualifeye
  • Forum
  • Search
  • Login
  • Login
    • Action
    • Another action
    • Something else here
    • Separated link

Search TurkerView

  • Requesters
  • HITs
  • Scripts

Sorry, have to turn this off for a day to try and fix a query search bug!

James Hennessey

Is this your requester account?
No Institutional Affiliation
  • Overview
  • Reviews 1
  • HITs

James Hennessey Ratings


Workers feel this requester pays very badly

Unrated

Approves Quickly

No Rejections

No Blocks
Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.

James Hennessey Wage History


Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.
Heads up! We'll never hide reviews unless they violate our Terms of Service.

Top Worker Review

  • More
    • Best
    • Newest
    • Rejected
    • Hourly (High)
    • Hourly (Low)
    • My Reviews

ChrisTurk Fast Reader
Reviews: 2,099
Points: 6,463
Ratings: 2,066
Segment and label objects in this image (All object classes) - $0.01

Underpaid

Unrated

Approved

$1.80 / hour

00:00:20 / completion time

Pros

You only have to annotate one object.
Perhaps this penny will be distributed heads up so its lucky?

Approved in 2 days exactly.

Cons

Its image annotation at a penny, that's always going to be difficult to make worth it but the poor layout, design, and server resources behind the HIT make it pretty much impossible.

The obvious issue with a penny HIT & images is that if the image loads slowly (which these did) you're already off to a rough start. Requester has them loaded on his crappy private server instead of allowing AWS to handle it for him & deliver content to workers quickly.

You'd think only having to annotate one object would make these somewhat okayish, even passable except that aside from the load times the images are also shared between all workers. So if you get an image that has all or most objects annotated, you're left twiddling your thumbs with nothing to really do or wasting time looking around for something to do. Some images are completely covered by annotation boxes and if you click one it throws an annoying dialog about how you're not allowed to edit someone else's work.

And to top it off the dropbox you have to use once closing in the object annotation to select what kind of object you're labeling is of course clunky and slows down the submission time considerably. It would be nice if the Requester split these up into "annotate doorways", "annotate mirrors" etc so that the dropdown wasn't necessary but that isn't the case for the HITs when I gave them a test run.
Aug 7, 2018 | 6 workers found this helpful.

Want to see James Hennessey's full profile?

Create Your Account

or Login

James Hennessey


A1TXARRSMZ2JC9 MTurk Search Contact Requester

Recently Reviewed HITs


Segment and label objects in this image (All object classes)

Ratings Legend

Wage Aggregates

Reward Sentiment

Communication Scores

Approval Tracking

Wage Aggregate Tracking

This is fairly straightforward: we take the completion time & the reward amount (where available) and calculate the average hourly rate for the task. We then apply that number to a simple range based on US minimum wage standards to color-code the data for easy to digest numerical data.

Color Pay Range (Hourly) Explanation
RED < $7.25 / hr Hourly averages below US Federal minimum wage
ORANGE $7.25 - $10.00 / hr Hourly averages between Federal & highest statewide (CA) minimum wages.
GREEN > $10.00 / hr Hourly averages above all US minimum wage standards

Reward Sentiment

Not all HITs are created equal. Sometimes an hourly wage doesn't convey the full story of a HIT's true worth, so we encourage workers to give their opinion on the overall pay of the task. Was it $8/hr to rate pictures of puppies? A worker could justifiably bump up the rating a bit for something so adorable. 10 hours locked in Inquisit? Even for $10/hr many workers would appreciate the heads up on such a task. The Pay Sentiment rating helps connect workers beyond the hard data.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Underpaid 1 / 5
  • Very low or no pay
  • Frustrating work experience
  • Inadequate instructions
Low 2 / 5
  • Below US min-wage ($7.25/hr)
  • No redeeming qualities to make up for pay
Fair 3 / 5
  • Minimum wages for task (consider SE taxes!)
  • Work experience offers nothing to tip the scales in a positive or negative direction
Good 4 / 5
  • Pay is above minimum wage, or compensates better than average for the level of effort required.
  • The overall work experience makes up for borderline wages
Generous 5 / 5
  • Pay is exceptional.
  • Interesting, engaging work or work environment
  • Concise instructions, well designed HIT.

Communication Ratings

Communication is an underrated aspect of mTurk. Clear, concise directions. A fast response to a clarification question or a resolution to a workflow suggestion can all be valuable aspects of interaction between Requesters & Workers and its worth keeping track of. Plus everyone enjoys the peace of mind knowing that if something does go wrong there will be an actual human getting back to you to solve the issue.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Unacceptable 1 / 5
  • No response at all
  • Rude response without a resolution
Poor 2 / 5
  • Responsive, but unhelpful
  • Required IRB or extra intervention
Acceptable 3 / 5
  • Responded in a reasonable timeframe
  • Resolves issues to a minimum level of satisfaction.
Good 4 / 5
  • Prompt Response
  • Positive resolution
Excellent 5 / 5
  • Prompt response time
  • Friendly & Professional
  • Helpful / Solved Issues
  • Interacts within the community

Approval Time Tracking

This rating is strictly for approval times. Let's face it, no one wants to mix approval time ratings with how fast a Requester rejects a HIT, so we've saved rejection flags for another category. This provides a more straightforward way to know about how long your HIT might sit pending before paying out. The default auto-approval for most MTurk tasks is 3 days, the maximum is 30 days. We've tried to base our ratings around those data-points.

Icon Rating Approval Time
Very Slow 1 / 5 Over 2 weeks
Slow 2 / 5 ~1 - 2 Weeks
Average 3 / 5 ~3 - 7 Days
Fast 4 / 5 ~1 - 3 Days
Very Fast 5 / 5 ~24 hours or less

Login

Login Failed! Please check your username/password and try again.
TurkerHub Member? Just use your normal TurkerHub credentials to log in to TurkerView.
Don't have an account? Register Here!

2025 TurkerView Privacy Terms Blog Contact