TurkerView
  • Requesters
  • Institutions
  • Scripts
  • Queuebicle
  • API
  • Qualifeye
  • Forum
  • Search
  • Login
  • Login
    • Action
    • Another action
    • Something else here
    • Separated link

Search TurkerView

  • Requesters
  • HITs
  • Scripts

Sorry, have to turn this off for a day to try and fix a query search bug!

Mechanical Turk Research

Is this your requester account?
No Institutional Affiliation
  • Overview
  • Reviews 8
  • HITs

Mechanical Turk Research Ratings


Workers feel this requester pays fairly

Good Communication

Approves Quickly

No Rejections

No Blocks
Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.

Mechanical Turk Research Wage History


Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.
Heads up! We'll never hide reviews unless they violate our Terms of Service.

Top Worker Reviews

  • More
    • Best
    • Newest
    • Rejected
    • Hourly (High)
    • Hourly (Low)
    • My Reviews

Cosmo Average Pace
Reviews: 33
Points: 246
Ratings: 61
Study on health and workplace environments - $2.00

Underpaid

Poor

Approved

$ / hour

00:00:00 / completion time

Pros

* Initially it seemed like a quick HIT.
* Reversed a rejection quickly.

Cons

* It was not properly sandboxed before posting. It should have been a 45 minute survey. So, I left my performance time out of this review. The HIT itself took me 2 minutes but probably over the 45 minutes of fighting a rejection. Even at $2 for 45 minutes, this is why I rated it as Underpaid.
* It seemed very quick at first, but I found out later that it was supposed to be a screener. But when you didn't pass the screener, it took you to the end AND auto-submitted the HIT.
* Reviewer sent everyone who took it an E-mail saying there was a mistake, with a link to complete the survey.
* Survey worked but then announced the screener portion of the HIT and wouldn't allow completion of the survey.
* E-mail reply went to a bouncing mailbox.
* HIT initially rejected 2 days later: "Sorry, you did not match our criteria. Thank you for your interest!"
* Looked at original E-mail and went to the .com of the E-mail address. Found the company's feedback forum.

Advice to Requester

SANDBOX your HITs before publishing them, especially if they include an auto-submit or a screener. Rejections affect our ability to do work, especially new MTurkers, it impacts them very severely!
Oct 25, 2017 | 5 workers found this helpful.

WildFlower Relaxed Pace
Reviews: 263
Points: 1,183
Ratings: 226
Study on health and workplace environments - $2.00

Underpaid

Excellent

Approved

$2.67 / hour

00:45:00 / completion time

Pros

Excellent communication. The Cons are all true, but I sent a message to the Requester on the website to alert them of all the problems, I received a prompt response, very professional and apologetic and assurance that they would be reversing the rejection, they just had a ton of problems receiving messages sent through MTurk.

Cons

- They made a mistake in how they set up their survey.
- Sent out an email with the way they actually wanted it to be and still rejected you even if you completed that.
- It would've been way more honest to just reject right then, not ask for additional information, screen you out and then reject you.
- They got a lot of free data out of this, because having a full survey pool, not just qualified participants is still important data.
- I'm basing pay generosity on their own estimate.

Advice to Requester

Learn how to post a proper screener so that you are not alienating people you need to complete your surveys in the future, which is what you've done by rejecting everyone including the people who followed the link in the email you sent out. Also, $2 for 45 minutes is abhorrent and unacceptable for a company based in the US and last time I checked, Celebration, FL where you are based is indeed part of the US. Up your pay to at least be in line with minimum wage.
Oct 25, 2017 | 4 workers found this helpful.

gurlondrums Average Pace
Reviews: 1,900
Points: 2,687
Ratings: 582
Study on health and workplace environments - $2.00

Fair

Excellent

Approved

$ / hour

00:00:00 / completion time

Pros

1. Responded to email on company website promptly.
2. Reversed rejection quickly.
3. Apologized for inconvenience.

Cons

1. Auto submitted after demographics.
2. Followup email was sent with link to full survey, got screened out but could not return hit as it auto-submitted.
3. Still rejected even after realizing their mistake.

Advice to Requester

Test your hits before making them live and rejecting based off the brokenness.
Oct 25, 2017 | 5 workers found this helpful.

Want to see Mechanical Turk Research's full profile?

Create Your Account

or Login

Mechanical Turk Research


A1M26OMBQUBA0Q MTurk Search Contact Requester

Recently Reviewed HITs


Study on health and workplace environments

Ratings Legend

Wage Aggregates

Reward Sentiment

Communication Scores

Approval Tracking

Wage Aggregate Tracking

This is fairly straightforward: we take the completion time & the reward amount (where available) and calculate the average hourly rate for the task. We then apply that number to a simple range based on US minimum wage standards to color-code the data for easy to digest numerical data.

Color Pay Range (Hourly) Explanation
RED < $7.25 / hr Hourly averages below US Federal minimum wage
ORANGE $7.25 - $10.00 / hr Hourly averages between Federal & highest statewide (CA) minimum wages.
GREEN > $10.00 / hr Hourly averages above all US minimum wage standards

Reward Sentiment

Not all HITs are created equal. Sometimes an hourly wage doesn't convey the full story of a HIT's true worth, so we encourage workers to give their opinion on the overall pay of the task. Was it $8/hr to rate pictures of puppies? A worker could justifiably bump up the rating a bit for something so adorable. 10 hours locked in Inquisit? Even for $10/hr many workers would appreciate the heads up on such a task. The Pay Sentiment rating helps connect workers beyond the hard data.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Underpaid 1 / 5
  • Very low or no pay
  • Frustrating work experience
  • Inadequate instructions
Low 2 / 5
  • Below US min-wage ($7.25/hr)
  • No redeeming qualities to make up for pay
Fair 3 / 5
  • Minimum wages for task (consider SE taxes!)
  • Work experience offers nothing to tip the scales in a positive or negative direction
Good 4 / 5
  • Pay is above minimum wage, or compensates better than average for the level of effort required.
  • The overall work experience makes up for borderline wages
Generous 5 / 5
  • Pay is exceptional.
  • Interesting, engaging work or work environment
  • Concise instructions, well designed HIT.

Communication Ratings

Communication is an underrated aspect of mTurk. Clear, concise directions. A fast response to a clarification question or a resolution to a workflow suggestion can all be valuable aspects of interaction between Requesters & Workers and its worth keeping track of. Plus everyone enjoys the peace of mind knowing that if something does go wrong there will be an actual human getting back to you to solve the issue.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Unacceptable 1 / 5
  • No response at all
  • Rude response without a resolution
Poor 2 / 5
  • Responsive, but unhelpful
  • Required IRB or extra intervention
Acceptable 3 / 5
  • Responded in a reasonable timeframe
  • Resolves issues to a minimum level of satisfaction.
Good 4 / 5
  • Prompt Response
  • Positive resolution
Excellent 5 / 5
  • Prompt response time
  • Friendly & Professional
  • Helpful / Solved Issues
  • Interacts within the community

Approval Time Tracking

This rating is strictly for approval times. Let's face it, no one wants to mix approval time ratings with how fast a Requester rejects a HIT, so we've saved rejection flags for another category. This provides a more straightforward way to know about how long your HIT might sit pending before paying out. The default auto-approval for most MTurk tasks is 3 days, the maximum is 30 days. We've tried to base our ratings around those data-points.

Icon Rating Approval Time
Very Slow 1 / 5 Over 2 weeks
Slow 2 / 5 ~1 - 2 Weeks
Average 3 / 5 ~3 - 7 Days
Fast 4 / 5 ~1 - 3 Days
Very Fast 5 / 5 ~24 hours or less

Login

Login Failed! Please check your username/password and try again.
TurkerHub Member? Just use your normal TurkerHub credentials to log in to TurkerView.
Don't have an account? Register Here!

2025 TurkerView Privacy Terms Blog Contact