TurkerView
  • Requesters
  • Institutions
  • Scripts
  • Queuebicle
  • API
  • Qualifeye
  • Forum
  • Search
  • Login
  • Login
    • Action
    • Another action
    • Something else here
    • Separated link

Search TurkerView

  • Requesters
  • HITs
  • Scripts

Sorry, have to turn this off for a day to try and fix a query search bug!

Altsuss

Is this your requester account?
University of Chicago
  • Overview
  • Reviews 4262
  • HITs 973

Altsuss Ratings


Workers feel this requester pays well

Okay Communication

Approves Quickly

Rejections Reported

No Blocks
Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.

Altsuss Wage History


Sorry, your browser doesn't support canvas elements.
Heads up! We'll never hide reviews unless they violate our Terms of Service.

Top Worker Reviews

  • More
    • Best
    • Newest
    • Rejected
    • Hourly (High)
    • Hourly (Low)
    • My Reviews

DarrenMT Fast Reader
Reviews: 98
Points: 644
Ratings: 40
Academic Survey(~ 7 minutes) - $1.05 +0.50 bonus Confirmed!

Good

Excellent

Approved

$14.53 / hour

00:06:24 / completion time

Pros

After I messaged her and pointed out how the pay rate for this was inconsistent with her average pay rate shown on Turkerview of around $16 per hour, she rectified the problem by issuing me a bonus. That's not unheard of for a Requester to do...but what makes her unique is that I didn't have to message her through MTurk or even at her college-issued email. I simply left a comment in the Feedback section of her survey, and she responded by bonusing me the amount I suggested in that comment. I would call it coincidence except that this is actually the second time that has happened; this is, her issuing me a bonus in response to my raising a valid grievance in the feedback section and suggesting a bonus amount.

No, I don't think that would work for every survey; on most of hers I don't have any complaints anyway because the pay/work ratio is fair. I also should point out here that I laid out my case in detail and politely, not via a "screw u scammer!" type "venting" comment. So, merely complaining might not have the same effect as a detailed grievance. Still, from all appearances, this Requester is a rare specimen...a Requester who actually reads the Feedback sections on her surveys.

Cons

In the interest of fairness I should put down that this HIT didn't initially pay almost $15/hour. It was more like $9.50. However, this did get remedied (and quickly, within a couple hours actually) when I messaged the Requester.
Feb 16, 2022 | 3 workers found this helpful.

Yoyo Average Pace
Reviews: 68
Points: 1,899
Ratings: 186
Academic survey studying people's financial behaviors(~ 12 minutes) - $2.80

Underpaid

Unrated

Rejected (Unfair)

$10.83 / hour

00:15:31 / completion time
  • HIT Rejected

Pros

Cons

Really sketchy. Requires you to give information on the amount you spent every day in the past week, and then verify it via a screenshot of your mobile banking information / credit card information / ect.

Although I followed the instructions exactly as they said to, putting in the amount I spent everyday, then taking a screenshot of my credit card information (besides blocking out all of the personal info - I used on credit card for all my purchases in the past week), they still rejected me.

The reason?

"Your work did not meet our standards"

A typical bot response. I don't believe a human being verified this work at all. If they did, they are clearly lazing and incompetent, seeing as they couldn't be bothered to actually explain what I apparently did wrong.

Did I not spend enough money during the past week? Were they actually scamming for personal information, and thus, blacking it out made them reject me?

Who knows!

Advice to Requester

If you're going to reject someone, don't make them jump through hoops first. It's crazy to make someone log into their banking or credit card app, collect personal payment info, and then still reject them after giving you everything on a silver platter, all without explaining why!

That's the other thing: If you're going to reject someone, at least have the courtesy to explain why. How do you expect Workers to meet your standards if you don't even tell them what your standards are or how to meet them?

Basically, instead of treating Workers like faceless robots that you can just get free work out of (assuming you aren't scamming for identifiable personal info, which seems plausible at this point), treat them like human beings, and explain what exactly you want. It's not hard.
Feb 16, 2024 | 2 workers found this helpful.

Hedgmog Careful Reader
Reviews: 10,159
Points: 22,045
Ratings: 1,426
Learning and Risk Taking (~ 15 minutes) - $1.00 +0.38 bonus Confirmed!

Unrated

Unrated

Approved

$5.69 / hour

00:14:33 / completion time

Pros

None pay wise but here is the structure of the hit - read instructions - work the first part and try to gain as many points as possible for a bonus - second part depending on the decision about the point accumulation just continue to work on the task - demographics - they do explain the bonus structure at the beginning but to be fair I had no idea how bad it was - could be done a little quicker

Cons

Bonus is not even worth bothering about I have to say for the length of the task I was so disappointed and I even doubled my points, I got a whopping 38c so a total of $1.38 for 15 minutes of my time!! Wow!!
Jun 3, 2022 | 2 workers found this helpful.

Want to see Altsuss's full profile?

Create Your Account

or Login

Altsuss


A1ATES40ZPE477 MTurk Search Contact Requester
Top Collaborating Institutions

Yale University The University of British Columbia The Ohio State University New York University

Recently Reviewed HITs


1-Minute Survey - Decision Making
10 min academic survey(~ 10 minutes)
10 minute academic survey(~ 10 minutes)
15 minute academic survey with $1.50 completion award
20 minute academic survey with $2.00 completion award

Ratings Legend

Wage Aggregates

Reward Sentiment

Communication Scores

Approval Tracking

Wage Aggregate Tracking

This is fairly straightforward: we take the completion time & the reward amount (where available) and calculate the average hourly rate for the task. We then apply that number to a simple range based on US minimum wage standards to color-code the data for easy to digest numerical data.

Color Pay Range (Hourly) Explanation
RED < $7.25 / hr Hourly averages below US Federal minimum wage
ORANGE $7.25 - $10.00 / hr Hourly averages between Federal & highest statewide (CA) minimum wages.
GREEN > $10.00 / hr Hourly averages above all US minimum wage standards

Reward Sentiment

Not all HITs are created equal. Sometimes an hourly wage doesn't convey the full story of a HIT's true worth, so we encourage workers to give their opinion on the overall pay of the task. Was it $8/hr to rate pictures of puppies? A worker could justifiably bump up the rating a bit for something so adorable. 10 hours locked in Inquisit? Even for $10/hr many workers would appreciate the heads up on such a task. The Pay Sentiment rating helps connect workers beyond the hard data.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Underpaid 1 / 5
  • Very low or no pay
  • Frustrating work experience
  • Inadequate instructions
Low 2 / 5
  • Below US min-wage ($7.25/hr)
  • No redeeming qualities to make up for pay
Fair 3 / 5
  • Minimum wages for task (consider SE taxes!)
  • Work experience offers nothing to tip the scales in a positive or negative direction
Good 4 / 5
  • Pay is above minimum wage, or compensates better than average for the level of effort required.
  • The overall work experience makes up for borderline wages
Generous 5 / 5
  • Pay is exceptional.
  • Interesting, engaging work or work environment
  • Concise instructions, well designed HIT.

Communication Ratings

Communication is an underrated aspect of mTurk. Clear, concise directions. A fast response to a clarification question or a resolution to a workflow suggestion can all be valuable aspects of interaction between Requesters & Workers and its worth keeping track of. Plus everyone enjoys the peace of mind knowing that if something does go wrong there will be an actual human getting back to you to solve the issue.

Icon Rating Suggested Guidelines
Unacceptable 1 / 5
  • No response at all
  • Rude response without a resolution
Poor 2 / 5
  • Responsive, but unhelpful
  • Required IRB or extra intervention
Acceptable 3 / 5
  • Responded in a reasonable timeframe
  • Resolves issues to a minimum level of satisfaction.
Good 4 / 5
  • Prompt Response
  • Positive resolution
Excellent 5 / 5
  • Prompt response time
  • Friendly & Professional
  • Helpful / Solved Issues
  • Interacts within the community

Approval Time Tracking

This rating is strictly for approval times. Let's face it, no one wants to mix approval time ratings with how fast a Requester rejects a HIT, so we've saved rejection flags for another category. This provides a more straightforward way to know about how long your HIT might sit pending before paying out. The default auto-approval for most MTurk tasks is 3 days, the maximum is 30 days. We've tried to base our ratings around those data-points.

Icon Rating Approval Time
Very Slow 1 / 5 Over 2 weeks
Slow 2 / 5 ~1 - 2 Weeks
Average 3 / 5 ~3 - 7 Days
Fast 4 / 5 ~1 - 3 Days
Very Fast 5 / 5 ~24 hours or less

Login

Login Failed! Please check your username/password and try again.
TurkerHub Member? Just use your normal TurkerHub credentials to log in to TurkerView.
Don't have an account? Register Here!

2025 TurkerView Privacy Terms Blog Contact